Categories
Aircraft

The Republic F-84 Thunderjet Was the ‘Champ of the Fighter-Bombers’

The Republic F-84 Thunderjet was an American jet-powered fighter-bomber. Primarily flown by the US Air Force from 1947-64, it suffered many issues during its development and early service. That being said, it performed admirably during the Korean War, and was the first aircraft used by the Thunderbirds.

Development of the F-84 Thunderjet

Republic F-84C Thunderjet parked on the runway
Republic F-84C Thunderjet with the 33rd Fighter Wing. (Photo Credit: United States Air Force / Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain)

On September 11, 1944, the US Army Air Forces set requirements for a “day fighter.” It would need a top speed of 600 MPH, a combat radius of 850 miles, and be armed with either eight 12.7 mm or six 15.2 mm cannons. These specifications were later adjusted to feature a smaller combat radius of 705 miles and fewer armaments.

Looking to replace the P-47 Thunderbolt, the USAAF placed an order with Republic for three prototypes of the XP-84. Trusting the company’s reputation, the service didn’t inquire with other manufacturers. The first prototype was completed in December 1945, with testing not occurring until February 1946, following delays with acquiring engines. Wind tunnel tests also showed design flaws with the vertical stabilizer at high speeds, and there were concerns over the weight of the aircraft.

Work commenced in 1947, with the first F-84Bs entering service by December of that year.

Republic F-84 Thunderjet Specs

Row of Republic F-84E Thunderjets parked along a runway
Republic F-84E Thunderjets with the 526th Fighter-Bomber Squadron. (Photo Credit: United States Air Force / Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain)

The F-84 Thunderjet’s general characteristics included a central air intake at the nose of the aircraft, straight wings with wingtip tanks, a sliding canopy that would later be modified with support struts and a tandem landing gear configuration. At its nose were six .50-caliber M3 Browning machine guns, and, later on, pylons were added under each wing and beneath the center of the aircraft to hold up to 32 rockets, 4,000 pounds of bombs or one Mark 7 nuclear bomb.

The F-84 was powered by an Allison J35-A-29 turbojet engine. The J-35 was the Air Force’s first axial-flow compressor jet engine, and it featured a simple design consisting of an 11-stage axial-flow and single-stage turbine. When paired with the afterburner, it produced 5,600 pounds of thrust.

New variants aim to fix persistent issues

Republic F-84E Thunderjet taking off
Republic F-84E Thunderjet with the 9th Fighter-Bomber Squadron, 49th Fighter-Bomber Group. (Photo Credit: USAF / Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain)

In December 1947, the first F-84B Thunderjets were delivered to the 14th Fighter Group at Dow Field, Maine. Maximum speed and acceleration restrictions were soon placed upon pilots, due to issues involving the wrinkling of the aircraft’s skin – a top speed of Mach 0.8 and no more than 5.5 g of acceleration.

Maintenance issues soon earned the F-84B the nickname, “Mechanic’s Nightmare.” These problems grounded the entirety of the F-84B fleet, and modifications were made to the incoming F-84C. These, however, didn’t prevent the new variant from suffering similar issues, with these aircraft also being grounded.

The introduction of the F-84D saved the fighter-bomber. Having fixed the prior issues, it enjoyed a clear superiority over the Air Force’s other jet fighter, the Lockheed F-80 Shooting Star. Modifications were made to the F-84Bs and -84Cs, which allowed them to re-enter service until their retirement in 1952. The F-84D also retired from service with the Air Force that year, but continued with the Air National Guard until 1957.
The F-84E was introduced in 1950. An improvement on the previous iterations, it was the first truly effective version. These improvements included new avionics and systems, a longer fuselage, strengthening of the wings, the addition of pylons to hold external fuel tanks and retractable ones for rockets beneath both wings.
Despite these improvements, the F-84E’s service was hindered by parts shortages, meaning around half of the fleet remained grounded. It was ultimately retired from service with the Air Force in 1956, with the Reserve following suit the next year. It remained in use with the Air National Guard until 1959.
In 1951, the F-84G entered service. Despite the introduction of inflight refueling capabilities, an improved engine and increased payload capability, it was really no more than a stopgap before the swept wing F-84F Thunderstreak was introduced. The Air Force received 789 units, while other countries acquired over 2,000. The F-84G retired from US service in 1964.

Service during the Korean War

Republic F-84 Thunderjet taking off
Republic F-84 Thunderjet during testing of the “Zero Length Launch (ZELL)” system. (Photo Credit: Unknown Author / USAF / Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain)

Upon the United States entering the Korean War, it was decided that an F-84 Thunderjet wing would be sent overseas. Arriving toward the end of 1950, they began sorties that December and scored their first air-to-air kill on January 21, 1951. However, this victory came at a cost: the loss of two of the fighter-bombers.

It was clear that the air-to-air combat role should be given to the North American F-86 Sabre, as the F-84 was better suited in a ground attack role. By the conclusion of the war, the aircraft had flown 86,408 sorties, dropped 55,586 tons of bombs and 6,129 tons of napalm, and fired 22,154 rockets. The F-84 was responsible for the destruction of 60 percent of all air-to-ground targets, as well as eight air-to-air kills against Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-15s.

According to the Air Force, 305 F-84s were lost during the conflict, 249 of which were combat-related.

US Air Force Thunderbirds

Republic F-84G Thunderjet parked on a runway
Republic F-84G Thunderjet with the 3,600th Air Demonstration Team, better known as the US Air Force Thunderbirds. (Photo Credit: United States Air Force / Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain)
On May 25th, 1953, the 3,600th Air Demonstration Team formed, with the purpose of putting on public displays, promoting the Air Force, and showcasing the abilities of the aircraft and the precision flying of their aviators. The first to be selected for this role was the F-84G Thunderjet, and it was used by the Thunderbirds from 1953-55.

The F-84E was also used by the Skyblazers, the lesser-known demonstration team with the US Air Forces in Europe.

Accomplishments of the Republic F-84 Thunderjet

Boeing YKB-29J Superfortress linked with a Republic F-84E Thunderjet mid-flight
Boeing YKB-29J Superfortress linked with a Republic F-84E Thunderjet from the 116th Fighter-Bomber Wing. (Photo Credit: USAF / Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain)

In addition to performing efficiently in combat during the Korean War, the F-84 Thunderjet became the first jet aircraft to successfully perform air-to-air refueling with a converted Boeing B-29 Superfortress.

In 1955, a F-84E became the first aircraft to perform a zero-length takeoff. This involved a solid-fuel booster rocket attached to the underside of the fighter-bomber, which enabled it to takeoff from anywhere, including a trailer.

Categories
Aircraft

The Vought F-8 Crusader was Nicknamed the ‘Last of the Gunfighters’

The Vought F-8 Crusader was an American jet-powered fighter that served with the US Navy from 1957-76. During its tenure, the aircraft participated in the Cuban Missile Crisis, as well as the Vietnam War. As the last American-made fighter to have guns as its primary armament, it was nicknamed the “Last of the Gunfighters.”

Development of the Vought F-8 Crusader

Vought F8U-1 Crusader in flight
Vought F8U-1 Crusader with Marine Fighter Squadron 334 (VMF-334), 1950s. (Photo Credit: U.S. Navy / U.S. Navy National Museum of Naval Aviation / Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain)

In September 1952, the Navy announced it was looking for a new fighter. It needed a maximum speed of Mach 1.2, a climb rate of 25,000 feet per minute and a maximum landing speed of 100 MPH. The decision was also made to arm the aircraft with 20 mm cannons, due to the inadequacies of .50-caliber machine guns during the Korean War.

Competitors for the contract included the Grumman F-11 Tiger, the McDonnell F3H Demon and the carrier version of the North American F-100 Super Sabre. Vought’s F-8 Crusader was deemed the winner in May 1953, with the Navy ordering three prototypes.

In December 1956, Air Development Squadron 3 (VX-3) completed the F-8’s qualifications onboard carriers. Deemed ready for service, the first aircraft joined Fighter Squadron 32 (VF-32), Fighter Squadron 154 (VF-154) and Marine Fighter Squadron 122 (VMF-122) in 1957.

Vought F-8 Crusader specs

Vought F-8E Crusader landing on the flight deck of the USS Bon Homme Richard (CVA-31)
Vought F-8E Crusader with Fighter Squadron 194 (VF-194) landing aboard the USS Bon Homme Richard (CVA-31), 1966. (Photo Credit: U.S. Navy / USS Bon Homme Richard 1965-1966 Cruise Book / Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain)

The F-8 Crusader had a distinctive look, with a central air intake under a pointed nose, high-mounted wings and a short landing gear giving it an overall crouched appearance. Unique to the aircraft was its variable-incidence wing. This meant the whole wing could be pitched up to a maximum of seven degrees, allowing for takeoff or landing at slower speeds, without pilots losing any visibility. This design also allowed lift to be maintained and increased by lowering the aircraft’s flaps and leading-edge.

The F-8 was powered by a single 18,000-pound static thrust with reheat Pratt and Whitney J57-P-20 turbojet. Its use with the F-8 was exceptional, allowing for a maximum speed of 1,227 MPH at 36,000 feet – this made it the first operational aircraft to fly faster than 1,000 MPH.

The primary armaments for the F-8 were four forward-firing 20 mm cannons. These weapons, in an era that saw the introduction and movement toward missiles, gave the aircraft its nickname: the “Last of the Gunfighters.” That being said, the F-8 was also equipped with pylons on either side of the fuselage and under the wings, allowing it to carry either four AIM-9 Sidewinders or up to 5,000 pounds of ordnance.

‘Ensign Eliminator’

Pilot ejecting from a Vought RF-8A Crusader mid-flight
Pilot with Light Photographic Squadron 62 (VFP-62) ejecting from a Vought RF-8A Crusader, 1963. (Photo Credit: U.S. Navy / U.S. Navy National Museum of Naval Aviation / Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain)

While the Navy had high hopes for the F-8 Crusader, the fighter wasn’t without its issues. This was largely due to its nose design, which made it particularly dangerous for pilots to land aboard aircraft carriers. To accomplish a safe landing, the vessels had to be traveling at full speed, to subsequently lower the relative landing speed of the F-8s, lest they and their pilots wind up in the ocean.

It already wasn’t an easy aircraft to fly, and this led pilots to give the aircraft another nickname: the “Ensign Eliminator.”

Problems also arose as the F-8 continued to see active service, particularly during the Vietnam War. Pilots had to eject a number of times, often resulting in the loss of the aircraft. It’s estimated that, out of the over 1,200 that were built by Vought, around 1,106 were involved in incidents.

Cuban Missile Crisis

Vought RF-8A Crusader preparing to land aboard the USS Midway (CV-41)
Vought RF-8A Crusader with Photographic Reconnaissance Squadron 63 (VFP-63), 1962. (Photo Credit: U.S. Navy / U.S. Naval and Heritage Command / National Archives and Records Administration / Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain)

Starting on October 23, 1962, F-8 Crusaders played a pivotal role in the capturing of reconnaissance images during the Cuban Missile Crisis. An unarmed variant, the RF-8A, was equipped with cameras, instead of missiles, and tasked with flying low-level reconnaissance missions over Cuba, to capture photos of Cuban and Soviet forces.

Flying two missions a day, these RF-8As would depart from Florida, fly over Cuba and, upon their return, have their images delivered to the Pentagon for examination. The photos captured by these aircraft confirmed the Soviets had begun efforts to install medium-range ballistic missiles in Cuba.

RF-8As continued to monitor the withdrawal of Soviet forces and missiles from the region. At the conclusion of the Cuban Missile Crisis, they’d captured a total of 160,000 images.

Vietnam War

Vought F-8H Crusader in flight
Vought F-8H Crusader with Fighter Squadron 111 (VF-111) over Vietnam, 1969. (Photo Credit: U.S. Navy / USS Ticonderoga 1969 Cruise Book / Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain)

The Vietnam War saw the F-8 Crusader gain its first combat experience.

When the conflict started, the aircraft stationed aboard the USS Hancock (CV-19) became the first from the US to enter into air-to-air combat with North Vietnamese-flown Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-17s. The incident occurred on April 3, 1965, and saw the F-8s score no kills. Despite one being hit by enemy fire, all safely returned to Hancock.

The first F-8 success came in June 1966. After getting into a dogfight with a MiG-17, Cmdr. Harold L. Marr fired two Sidewinders. The first missed, but the second hit the MiG’s tail, blowing off it and the starboard wing.
By the end of the war, F-8s had claimed between 18-19 air-to-air kills (depending on the source), the majority of which were achieved with Sidewinder missiles. Only four were attributed to the fighters’ guns, due to the magazines’ propensity to jam during high-speed dogfights.
The aircraft enjoyed the greatest kill ratio of all US fighters during the conflict, only suffering three losses in combat. Others, in greater numbers, were lost to flak, surface-to-air missiles (SAMs) and operational accidents. This meant the total number lost in Vietnam hit between 166-170.

Vought F-8 Crusader’s service with the French Navy

Vought F-8E(FN) Crusader preparing to land aboard the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN-69)
French Vought F-8E(FN) Crusader preparing to land, 1983. (Photo Credit: USN / Defense Imagery / Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain)

The F-8 Crusader entered service with the French Navy in 1964 and quickly became the backbone of the country’s naval air power, serving aboard two aircraft carriers, Clemenceau and Foch.

French F-8E(FN)s saw service over Lebanon in 1983. Between 1991-94, they were rebuilt, extending their service life until the end of the decade. Despite its continued service, the F-8 didn’t join the French forces fighting in the Gulf War, nor during the Kosovo Air Campaign.

In December 1999, the French retired their remaining fleet of F-8s, replacing the aircraft with the Dassault Rafale M the following year.

Categories
Aircraft

Cessna A-37 Dragonfly: The Forgotten Legend of Vietnam

The Cessna A-37 Dragonfly is an American light attack aircraft. Developed from the T-37 Tweet basic trainer, which earned it the nickname, “Super Tweet,” it served with the US Air Force throughout the Vietnam War. The aircraft also saw extensive flight time outside the United States, and is currently flown by six different air forces in South America.

Development of the Cessna A-37 Dragonfly

Cessna T-37 Tweet in flight
Cessna T-37 Tweet with the 85th Flying Training Squadron. (Photo Credit: Staff Sgt. Andy Dunaway / United States Air Force / Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain)

In the early 1960s, as the US became more involved in Vietnam, the need arose for a counter-insurgency (COIN) aircraft. COIN operations included forward air control (FAC), reconnaissance, air escort and ground support missions.

In 1962, the Air Force’s Special Air Warfare Center looked at the T-37C as the aircraft to fill this role. Seen as a promising fit with the necessary modifications, the service contracted Cessna for two prototypes. The YAT-37D was produced with shorter wings (three pylons on each), larger wingtip fuel tanks, a General Electric minigun, improved avionics and a more robust landing gear. The first prototype flew in October 1964.

Despite positive results, the program was stopped as interest faded. The decision seemed definite, with one of the prototypes being sent to the National Museum of the United States Air Force at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio for public display (which it would do after being retired for a second and final time in 1970).

Continued escalation in Vietnam saw the increased loss of Douglas A-1 Skyraiders, renewing the need for a COIN aircraft. The Air Force, again, contracted Cessna for 39 AT-37Ds, which were later re-designated as A-37As, for testing. In 1967, to fast track the aircraft’s development, the A-37 was sent to Vietnam for combat evaluations.

Cessna A-37 Dragonfly specs

Minigun compartment in the right nose of a Cessna D-37B Dragonfly
Cessna A-37B Dragonfly minigun compartment. (Photo Credit: U.S. Air Force / Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain)

Despite its small stature, the A-37 Dragonfly carried an impressive amount of armament. Located in the right side of the aircraft’s nose was a single 7.62 mm General Electric GAU-2B/A minigun. Other munitions included bombs, napalm, the SUU-11/A minigun pod and rocket packs. With eight pylons – three under each wing and two beneath the main airframe – the A-37 could carry up to 3,000 pounds of bombs, rockets and missiles.

At the tip of both wings were fitted fuel tanks, and the aircraft was powered by two General Electric J85-GE-17A turbojets. Each produced 2,400 pounds of thrust, allowing for a top speed of between 485-507 MPH.

Baptism by fire

Cessna A-37B Dragonfly in flight
South Vietnamese-flown Cessna A-37B Dragonfly with the 516th Fighter Squadron on its way to attack Viet Cong positions in Ba-To, near Da Nang. (Photo Credit: United States Air Force / Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain)

The first A-37A Dragonflies were sent to Vietnam in August 1967 as part of the Combat Dragon evaluation program, during which they flew close air support, FAC, helicopter escort and night interdiction missions.

This baptism by fire was unusual. As Lon Holtz, who piloted A-37s, McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom IIs and General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcons, stated in an interview with Smithsonian Magazine, “No other aircraft had ever gone into combat that hadn’t been tested previously. Other fighters were proven here in the States […] That’s not the case with the A-37. This aircraft went over to prove itself in combat.”
At the conclusion of Combat Dragon in December 1967, the A-37A had flown 3,000 missions and not a single aircraft had been downed by enemy fire. The only two lost were due to landing accidents. The A-37 Dragonfly had proven itself.
That being said, some issues were realized, mainly around the A-37’s lack of range and endurance. These and other problems were taken into consideration, leading Cessna to develop the A-37B. Purpose built, unlike the “A” variant, it featured larger fuel tanks, a refueling probe on the nose, a heavier fuselage and a stronger engine.

Service during the Vietnam War

Two Cessna A-37B Dragonflies in flight
South Vietnamese-flown Cessna A-37B Dragonflies with the 74th Tactical Wing. (Photo Credit: USAF / Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain)

In combat, the A-37 Dragonfly enjoyed pinpoint accuracy that others did not. Unlike swept wing aircraft that flew at high speeds, it was able to slow attack runs to only 100 MPH. This resulted in an average hitting range within a 45 foot radius of a target. As one forward air controller remarked, “Thank God, now I have somebody who can actually hit the d**n target.”

During the Vietnam War, A-37s were used by the Republic of Vietnam Air Force, as well as the US Air Force. In total, the aircraft flew 68,471 missions between 1967-74 (some sources say more than 160,000 combat sorties), focused on regions in South Vietnam. Despite valiantly taking part in the air war, the A-37 has been largely overlooked in favor of Vietnam’s “Heavy Metal,” including the F-4 Phantom II, the North American F-100 Super Sabre and the Republic F-105 Thunderchief.

After the conflict, the A-37 continued to serve with the Air National Guard and Air Force Reserve, before being replaced by the Fairchild Republic A-10 Thunderbolt II.

Cessna A-37 Dragonfly in Central and South America

Cessna A-37 Dragonfly in flight
Honduran Air Force Cessna A-37 Dragonfly during the “Ahuas Tara” combined US/Honduran training exercise. (Photo Credit: TSGT KEN HAMMOND / Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain)

Outside of American use in Vietnam, the A-37D was – and continues to be flown – extensively in Central and South America. Exported to many countries in the 1970s, the aircraft perfectly fit the needs of Latin American air forces, mainly for counter-insurgency and counter-narcotics operations.

In 1983, 21 A-37Bs and nine OA-37Bs were sold to the Salvadoran Air Force as a replacement for the service’s aging Dassault Ouragans. The aircraft was used extensively during the Salvadoran Civil War, which ended the conflict with only nine still operational. There are six current operators of the A-37: Columbia, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Peru and Uruguay.
Categories
Aircraft

The McDonnell F3H Demon Was Doomed Before It Ever Entered Service

The US Navy has operated an array of aircraft throughout its history, but few had as short a service life as the McDonnell F3H Demon. Developed to counter the powerful fighters coming out of the Soviet Union, its engine issues resulted in several delays. When it was finally ready to see combat, it was already a relic, and, before long, was superseded by the F-4 Phantom II.

Development of the McDonnell F3H Demon

McDonnell F2H Banshee in flight
McDonnell F2H Banshee, 1950s. (Photo Credit: USN / U.S. Navy Strike Fighter Squadron 41 / Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain)

The McDonnell F3H Demon was developed as a replacement for the company’s earlier single-seat, carrier-based F2H Banshee. In 1948, aware the Soviet Union was developing the high-performance Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-15, the US Navy issued a call for a swept-wing fighter. The need for such an aircraft only grew when the MiG-15 made its debut in Korea, showing its superiority over the F2H and Grumman F9F Panther.

Before long, prototypes for the F3H began to roll off the production line. It was the first swept-wing design from McDonnell and among the first US aircraft capable of equipping missiles.

Engine issues plagued the development phase

Two workers standing around a Westinghouse J40 engine in a factory
Westinghouse J40 engine, 1952. (Photo Credit: USN / U.S. Navy Naval Aviation News / Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain)

One of the issues that plagued the F3H Demon was its engine. The US Navy had initially envisioned the aircraft equipped with a Westinghouse J40. The appeal was that the J40 would produce more power than traditional engines, and just a single one would be required per aircraft.

However, issues arose upon the J40 being equipped by the F3H. While this can partially be attributed to the aircraft’s weight (it was a hefty 33,900-39,000 pounds), the engine ultimately failed to produce the promised thrust and was unreliable. While numbers vary, there were several recorded instances of J40-equipped F3Hs becoming involved in accidents that resulted in the deaths of their pilots.

All this led the Navy to replace the J40 with the less-powerful Allison J71 engine.

McDonnell F3H Demon specs

Two McDonnell F-3B Demons in flight
McDonnell F-3B Demons with Fighter Squadron 13 (VF-13), 1963. (Photo Credit: U.S. Navy / U.S. Navy National Museum of Naval Aviation / Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain)

With a length of 59 feet and a wingspan of 35.4 feet, the McDonnell F3H Demon was of a similar size to its counterparts. Manned by a crew of one, it could reach a top speed of 716 MPH at sea level and 647 MPH when flying at 30,000 feet. Due to its rather high fuel consumption, it only had an operational range of between 1,180 and 1,370 miles.

From the cockpit, pilots had an unobstructed view of the air around them, affording the F3H the nickname, “The Chair.” It was also given another, less flattering nickname, “Lead Sled,” due to its less than favorable power-to-weight ratio.
The F3H-2 featured AN/APG-51A radar, which saw frequent upgrades as different variants of the aircraft were developed. The F3H’s armament also changed throughout its service life. Originally equipped with four 20 mm colt Mk 12 cannons, the overall total was later decreased to two, to decrease the aircraft’s weight.
Subsequent models, such as the F3H-2M, were armed with missiles – the Raytheon AAM-N-2 Sparrow and, later, the AIM-9 Sidewinder. These later versions were also capable of carrying up to 6,000 pounds of bombs.

A rather short service career

McDonnell F3H-2 Demon in flight
McDonnell F3H-2 Demon equipped with AIM-7 Sparrow missiles, 1958. (Photo Credit: USN / U.S. Navy Naval Aviation News / Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain)

While the F3H Demon didn’t have the supersonic abilities the US Navy had hoped it would, it was still effective as an all-weather, missile-armed interceptor. This meant it was the ideal companion for the service’s day fighters, such as the Grumman F-11 Tiger and the Vought F-8U Crusader.

The F3H saw action in only a handful of conflicts, all of which occurred in 1958. The first was the Lebanese Civil War, a political crisis caused by religious and political tensions in the country. The second was the Second Taiwan Strait Crisis, which many view as “the first serious nuclear crisis.” Operating in all conditions, the F3H provided fleet defense over Quemoy Island.

Throughout this time, pilots grew to appreciate the aircraft’s abilities, with the airmen given the nickname, “Demon Drivers.” Those who worked on the F3H were affectionately known as “Demon Doctors.”

Retirement of the McDonnell F3H Demon

McDonnell F-3C Demon parked on the tarmac
McDonnell F-3C Demon with Fighter Squadron 161 (VF-161) at Naval Air Station Miramar, California, 1964. (Photo Credit: U.S. Navy / U.S. Navy National Museum of Naval Aviation / Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain)
The F3H Demon remained in frontline service with the US Navy until 1962, and it was withdrawn before it could see action in Vietnam. It was replaced by the McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom II. Viewed as an advanced version of the F3H, the F-4 was just as capable as its predecessor at targeting ground and air targets.
The last F3H-equipped fighter squadron flew the aircraft until September 1964. There are currently three on-display across the United States: at the Intrepid Sea, Air & Space Museum in New York City; the National Naval Aviation Museum at Naval Air Station Pensacola; and the Pima Air & Space Museum, near Davis-Monthan Air Force Base, Arizona.
Categories
Aircraft

Korean War Helicopters That Were Vital to Those Serving In the Conflict

The Korean War took place between 1950-53 and saw the UN coalition forces operate a plethora of military vehicles, including helicopters. The United States, in particular, employed several different types for a variety of needs. The following is a list of six choppers of different sizes, speeds, shapes and purposes. Each was influential to – or influenced by – the war effort and proved they had the chops to serve in the skies.

Bell H-13 Sioux

Bell H-13 Sioux in flight
Bell H-13 Sioux with MEDEVAC panniers. (Photo Credit: U.S. Air Force / Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain)

The Bell H-13 Sioux is arguably the most famous Korean War-era helicopter, becoming the first to be deployed in the conflict. It’s easily recognized by its “soap bubble” canopy and exposed tube tail. It was a single-engine light helicopter that was largely used as a MEDEVAC and reconnaissance craft, while also seeing use in liaison and training purposes. 

The H-13 could house three crewmen in its cockpit, and reached a maximum speed of 105 MPH, with a range of 273 miles. Despite being a light helicopter, it could still carry up to 2,500 pounds, which was crucial in MEDEVAC situations. The H-13 became an icon of Korea, not just because of its service, but for its appearance on the famous television show M*A*S*H* (1972-83).

Hiller OH-23 Raven

Hiller OH-23B Raven taking off
Hiller OH-23B Raven. (Photo Credit: U.S. Army / Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain)

The Hiller OH-23 Raven was deployed at around the same time as the Bell H-13 Sioux, making it, too, one of the most famous helicopters of the Korean War. Initial designs for the chopper had the cockpit sloping forward, but this was ultimately replaced, giving the OH-23 its recognizable “goldfish bowl” canopy. 

OH-23s were used more for observation and scouting missions, but also performed MEDEVAC and training roles. The helicopter was almost as fast as the H-13, reaching a maximum speed of 95 MPH, and had a range of 197 miles. The chopper could be equipped with either twin M37C .30-caliber or M60C 7.62 mm machine guns, when necessary.

The most notable use of an OH-23 was actually during the Vietnam War, with pilot Hugh Thompson Jr.‘s curtailing of the Mỹ Lai Massacre, for which he was branded a traitor by many in the US government and public.

Piasecki HUP Retriever / H-25 Army Mule

Piasecki HUP-2 Retriever in flight
Piasecki HUP-2 Retriever. (Photo Credit: SgtE4. Harold Woodrom / USMC / Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain)

The Piasecki HUP Retriever / H-25 Army Mule looked nothing like the first two helicopters mentioned on this list. It was designed for the US Navy in 1945 as a carrier-based search and rescue craft. However, the Army purchased it in 1951 and converted the helicopter into a cargo carrier and air ambulance for service in the Korean War, giving it the H-25 designation.

The HUP/H-25 was a compact, single radial engine, twin overlapping tandem rotor chopper. It had two three-bladed rotors, and was equipped with a winch that could hoist up to 400 pounds. It became the first helicopter to be built with an autopilot system, and was the first to perform a loop. The helicopter had a maximum speed of 105 MPH and a range of 340 miles.

Sikorsky H-5 Dragonfly

Sikorsky HO3S-1 in flight
US Navy Sikorsky HO3S-1. (Photo Credit: U.S. Navy / Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain)

The Sikorsky H-5 Dragonfly was one of the most active helicopters of the Korean War. It was primarily used in rescue missions to save downed UN pilots, as well as evacuate wounded soldiers from the frontlines. It had a recognizable two-pilot tandem cockpit, and operated using a three-bladed main rotor and a two-bladed tail unit.

The H-5 had a maximum speed of 106 MPH, with a range of 360 miles. It could carry two medical litters on external panniers, giving it the ability to lift an additional 1,000 pounds.

Sikorsky H-19 Chickasaw

Sikorsky UH-19D Chicksaw in flight
Sikorsky UH-19D Chickasaw. (Photo Credit: U.S. Army / Wikimedia Commons CC BY-SA 4.0)

The Sikorsky H-19 Chickasaw helicopter eventually replaced the H-5 during the Korean War, and is considered the US Army’s first proper transport helicopter. Much like its predecessor, the H-19 was used in evacuating downed pilots from behind enemy lines, but also served as a supply carry craft. Its design relocated the engine to the front, allowing for a better balance of weight when carrying different weight loads. 

The H-19 was a large, dual-rotor helicopter that could carry a crew of two. It could also hold an additional 10 personnel when operating as a transport carrier or up to six litter patients and a nurse, if serving as an air ambulance. The H-19 could reach a maximum speed of 101 MPH, and had a range of 450 miles. 

Piasecki H-21 Shawnee / Workhorse

Piasecki H-21 Shawnee in flight
Piasecki H-21 Shawnee. (Photo Credit: USAF / Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain)

The Piasecki H-21 Shawnee/Workhorse helicopter was more of a product of the Korean War, rather than having served during it. The chopper was developed and completed during the conflict, and took its first test flight in 1952. It was nicknamed the “Flying Banana,” due to its unusual shape, which was a measure taken to ensure the rotors could never make impact with the fuselage.

It was a tandem-rotor helicopter that could be used for multi-mission purposes, thanks to its equipment, which included wheels, skis and floats. The H-21 could hit speeds of 127 MPH and could carry over 6,000 pounds. It was so large that it could hold either 22 fully-equipped infantrymen or 12 stretchers, while still having space for two medical attendants.

Categories
Archaeology World

The Harrowing Remains of the Battle of Visby’s Medieval Massacre

The Battle of Visby was a violent medieval battle near the town of Visby on the Swedish island of Gotland, fought between the inhabitants of Gotland and the Danes, with the latter emerging victorious.

The Battle of Visby left a lasting archaeological legacy; as masses of slaughtered soldiers and citizens lay scattered across what was once a bloody battle field. Slashed and broken bones, skeletons still in their chain mail and armor, and smashed skulls, some still with spears and knives protruding out of them. One can only imagine what they endured before they breathed their last breaths.

The Harrowing Remains of the Battle of Visby's Medieval Massacre

Victim of the Battle of Visby in 1361. (Wolfgang Sauber / CC BY-SA 3.0)

Backdrop to the Battle of Visby: A Greedy King Set’s His Sights on Visby

During the Middle Ages, the island of Gotland, situated in the Baltic Sea off the coast of Sweden, occupied a significant position in the complex web of trade networks connecting Europe and Russia. This strategic location made the city of Visby, nestled on Gotland’s shores, a thriving hub for commerce and cultural exchange.

From the late 13th century onward, Visby became an integral member of the Hanseatic League, a confederation of merchant towns spanning Northwestern and Central Europe. The Hanseatic League, beyond facilitating trade, acted as a protective and defensive alliance, ensuring the security and interests of its member cities.

  • The Battle of Grunwald: An Iconic Medieval Battle of Central and Eastern Europe
  • Sweden’s Mysterious Shipwrecks Found Full of Medieval Household Goods

However, as the Hanseatic League’s influence expanded, it began to cast a shadow that some rulers found unsettling. Among those perturbed was Valdemar IV, the King of Denmark. Valdemar harbored dissatisfaction over the Hanseatic League’s perceived rivalry with his kingdom’s trade interests and coveted the wealth amassed by the league’s member towns.

By the middle of the 14th century, Visby, despite its continued affiliation with the Hanseatic League, experienced a decline as a significant trading center. This situation did not escape Valdemar’s attention, prompting him to focus his ambitions on capturing the city. Moreover, rumors circulated that the inhabitants of Visby sang derisive drinking songs mocking the Danish king, fueling his personal vendetta against them.

Valdemar IV’s motivations to attack Visby, therefore, stemmed from a combination of economic rivalry, territorial ambitions and personal grievances. This multifaceted backdrop set the stage for the violent confrontation that would become known as the Battle of Visby in 1361, ultimately reshaping the fate of this once-thriving medieval trading city.

The Harrowing Remains of the Battle of Visby's Medieval Massacre

Valdemar Atterdag holding Visby to ransom in 1361, by Karl Gustaf Hellqvist. (Public domain)

The Danish Invasion and the Battle of Visby

In the summer of 1361, a Danish army set sail for Gotland. The inhabitants of Visby had been warned about the invading Danish force and prepared themselves for the battle. In late July 1361, Valdermar’s army landed on the west coast of Gotland. The Danish army numbered between 2,000 and 2,500 men, and was comprised mainly of experienced Danish and German mercenaries. The defending Gotlanders, on the other hand, numbered around 2,000, and were militiamen with little or no experience of battle.

The Gotlanders first tried to halt the advance of the Danish army at Mästerby, in the central part of the island. The defenders were crushed at Mästerby and the Danes continued their march towards Visby.

The Battle of Visby was fought before the walls of the town. Although the militiamen were fighting for their lives, and fought as best as they could, they were simply no match for the professional Danish army. As a result, the majority of the defenders were killed and the town surrendered to Valdemar.

The Harrowing Remains of the Battle of Visby's Medieval Massacre

The first excavation of the mass graves from the Battle of Visby in 1361, led by Oscar Wilhelm Wennersten in 1905. (Julius Jääskeläinen / CC BY 2.0)

Excavations of the Battle of Visby’s Mass Graves

Those who fell during the battle were buried in several mass graves and were left in peace until the 20th century. Between 1905 and 1928, the mass graves were discovered and subsequently excavated. More than 1,100 human remains were unearthed, providing archaeologists with a plethora of information about the battle.

The types of weapons used during the Battle of Visby could be determined based on the injuries left on these remains. About 450 of these wounds, for instance, were inflicted by cutting weapons, such as swords and axes, whilst wounds inflicted by piercing weapons, such as spears and arrows, numbered around 120.

  • Axe-Wounded Visby Warrior Brought to Life Over 600 Years Later
  • Hidden Horrors: 10 of History’s Most Shocking Mass Graves

By studying the bones left behind in the wake of the Battle of Visby, it was also found that at least a third of the defenders of Visby were the elderly, children or the crippled, an indication that the situation was very dire indeed for the townsfolk.

The Harrowing Remains of the Battle of Visby's Medieval Massacre

Armored glove found at Visby. (Gabriel Hildebrand)

Fallen Soldiers from the Battle of Visby

It is assumed that the dead were buried quickly after the battle, and therefore were interred with the equipment they had during the battle, which included their armor and weapons. Thanks to their excellent state of preservation, these remains are a unique archaeological find.

Although not many of the defenders were well-equipped for the battle, there are several examples of chainmail shirts, coifs, gauntlets and a variety of weapons. These incredible remains, along with the human remains, are today displayed in the Gotland Museum and remain as a lasting legacy to the defenders of Visby.

Categories
Archaeology World

The two-headed mummy that stirred panic in Ottoman palace

Two-headed Egyptian mummy in the Topkapı Palace Museum (L) and the mummy of child in Istanbul’s Archaeological Museum (R), where five more mummies can also be found.

An ancient Egyptian mummy with two heads, belonging to a human child and a crocodile, has been photographed for the first time on July 6, after more than a century of its “exile” ordered by the Ottoman Sultan Abdulhamid II.

Turkish officials has recently issued permit for daily Hürriyet to film the only mummy kept at Istanbul’s Topkapı Palace.

Despite its unusual appearance and interesting story, the Topkapı mummy has been far from the public eye, unlike six other mummies kept at Istanbul Archaeology Museum, which belong to relatively more important historical figures, like the Sidon King Tabnit.

According to Turkish experts speaking to daily Hürriyet, the Topkapı mummy was composed of the head of an unidentified ancient Egyptian princess and the head and body of a Nile crocodile.

The legend says the Pharaonic Egypt’s princess was killed by a crocodile in the Nile and the rulers of the time decided to combine the two bodies with the belief that the kid would be resurrected in the afterlife as a crocodile.

The mummy was brought from Egypt to Turkey during the rule of Ottoman Sultan Abdulaziz in the mid-1800s. It was kept at Yıldız Palace in Istanbul, which was the sultan’s official residence at the time, until Abdulhamid II “exiled” it to the older palace of Topkapı.

Turkish historian İbrahim Hakkı Konyalı wrote in the 1950s an anecdote about the mummy. According to Konyalı, the residents of Yıldız Palace were scared one night when they heard loud bangs coming from the sugar storage of the complex and found the crocodile head on top of sacks.

It was merely a joke made by the palace servant Hacı Süleyman, who wanted to take revenge from the royal candy maker who refused his requests, the historian wrote.

On the panic night at the palace, Hacı Süleyman told everyone that he could get rid of the mummy, only if he was given the candies he wanted. The palace administration agreed and Hacı Süleyman simply took the head that he placed on sugar sacks and put back on the mummy body, which was kept in the cold room.

Hacı Süleyman got the candies he wanted and the mummy was sent to exile by the sultan to relieve the palace residents, according to the historian.

The two-headed mummy that stirred panic in Ottoman palace

Categories
Archaeology World

Mass Graves discovered in Himera. Hidden in 54 Corpses, a Revelation About Ancient Greece – The New York Times – T-News

Archaeologists υncovered the reмains of dozens of soldiers who foυght in the Battle of Hiмera. Evidence for мass bυrials of war dead is extreмely rare in the ancient Greek world. (Coυrtesy Soprintendenza Archeologica di Palerмo)

Mass Graves discovered in Himera. Hidden in 54 Corpses, a Revelation About Ancient Greece - The New York Times - T-News

It was one of the ancient world’s greatest battles, pitting a Carthaginian arмy coммanded by the general Haмilcar against a Greek alliance for control of the island of Sicily. After a fierce strυggle in 480 B.C. on a coastal plain oυtside the Sicilian city of Hiмera, with heavy losses on both sides, the Greeks eventυally won the day. As the years passed, the Battle of Hiмera assυмed legendary proportions. Soмe Greeks woυld even claiм it had occυrred on the saмe day as one of the faмoυs battles of Therмopylae and Salaмis, crυcial contests that led to the defeat of the Persian invasion of Greece, also in 480 B.C., and two of the мost celebrated events in Greek history.

Nonetheless, for sυch a мoмentoυs battle, Hiмera has long been soмething of a мystery. The ancient accoυnts of the battle, by the fifth-centυry B.C. historian Herodotυs and the first-centυry B.C. historian Diodorυs Sicυlυs (“the Sicilian”), are biased, confυsing, and incoмplete. Archaeology, however, is beginning to change things. For the past decade, Stefano Vassallo of the Archaeological Sυperintendency of Palerмo has been working at the site of ancient Hiмera. His discoveries have helped pinpoint the battle’s precise location, clarified the ancient historians’ accoυnts, and υnearth new evidence of how classical Greek soldiers foυght and died.

Mass Graves discovered in Himera. Hidden in 54 Corpses, a Revelation About Ancient Greece - The New York Times - T-News

Bυried near the soldiers were the reмains of 18 horses that likely died dυring the battle, inclυding this one that still has a bronze ring froм its harness in its мoυth. (Pasqυale Sorrentino)

Mass Graves discovered in Himera. Hidden in 54 Corpses, a Revelation About Ancient Greece - The New York Times - T-News

Mass Graves discovered in Himera. Hidden in 54 Corpses, a Revelation About Ancient Greece - The New York Times - T-News

Archaeologist Stefano Vassallo has been excavating the site of ancient Hiмera for мany years. This soldier’s reмains were foυnd with a spearblade still eмbedded in his left side. (Coυrtesy Soprintendenza Archeologica di Palerмo; Pasqυale Sorrentino)

Beginning in the мiddle of the eighth centυry B.C., when the Greeks foυnded their first colonies on the island and the Carthaginians arrived froм North Africa to establish their presence there, Sicily was a prize that both Greeks and Carthaginians coveted. The Greek city of Hiмera, foυnded aroυnd 648 B.C., was a key point in this rivalry. Hiмera coммanded the sea-lanes along the north coast of Sicily as well as a мajor land roυte leading soυth across the island. In the first decades of the fifth centυry B.C., the coмpetition to doмinate Sicily intensified. Gelon of Syracυse and Theron of Akragas, both rυlers of Greek cities on the island, forмed an alliance not only to coυnter the power of Carthage, bυt also to gain control of Hiмera froм their fellow Greeks. They soon achieved their goal and exiled the city’s Greek rυler, who then appealed to Carthage for help. Seeing an opportυnity to seize the υpper hand in the strυggle for Sicily, the Carthaginian leader Haмilcar мobilized his forces. The stage was set for the battle of Hiмera.

Mass Graves discovered in Himera. Hidden in 54 Corpses, a Revelation About Ancient Greece - The New York Times - T-News

The fυllest accoυnt of what happened next coмes froм Diodorυs Sicυlυs. The historian claiмs that Haмilcar sailed froм Carthage with a hυge arмy of soмe 300,000 troops, bυt a мore realistic figure is probably aroυnd 20,000. Along the way, Haмilcar’s fleet ran into a storм that sank the transports carrying his horses and chariots. Undeterred, the general set υp a fortified seaside caмp on the shore west of Hiмera to protect his reмaining ships and bυilt walls to block the western land approaches to the city. The oυtnυмbered Greek defenders sallied oυt froм the city to protect Hiмera’s territory, only to lose the first skirмishes.

Before Vassallo began his excavations, scholars had been υnable to pinpoint the location of these clashes. In 2007, however, he υncovered the northwestern corner of the city’s fortification wall. He also foυnd evidence that the coastline had shifted since ancient tiмes, as silt carried froм the streaмs above Hiмera broadened the plain. These two discoveries clarify Diodorυs’ accoυnt. The fighting мυst have occυrred in the coastal plain between the wall and the ancient shoreline, which in the fifth centυry B.C. was closer to the city than it is today.

Althoυgh the Greeks received reinforceмents, they were still oυtnυмbered. In the end, they got lυcky. According to Diodorυs, scoυts froм Gelon’s caмp intercepted a letter to Haмilcar froм allies who proмised to send cavalry to replace the losses he had sυffered at sea. Gelon ordered soмe of his own cavalry to iмpersonate Haмilcar’s arriving allies. They woυld blυff their way into Haмilcar’s seaside caмp and then wreak havoc. The rυse worked. At sυnrise the disgυised Greek cavalry rode υp to the Carthaginian caмp, where υnsυspecting sentries let theм in. Galloping across the caмp, Gelon’s horseмen 𝓀𝒾𝓁𝓁ed Haмilcar (althoυgh the historian Herodotυs says Haмilcar 𝓀𝒾𝓁𝓁ed hiмself) and set fire to the ships drawn υp on the beach. At that signal, Gelon advanced froм Hiмera to мeet the Carthaginians in pitched battle.

Mass Graves discovered in Himera. Hidden in 54 Corpses, a Revelation About Ancient Greece - The New York Times - T-News

Scholars have long qυestioned Diodorυs’ description of these events, bυt in 2008 Vassallo’s teaм began to excavate part of Hiмera’s western necropolis, jυst oυtside the city wall, in preparation for a new rail line connecting Palerмo and Messina. The excavations revealed 18 very rare horse bυrials dating to the early fifth centυry B.C. These bυrials reмind υs of Diodorυs’ accoυnt of the cavalry stratageм the Greeks υsed against Haмilcar. Were these perhaps the мoυnts of the horseмen who blυffed their way into the Carthaginian caмp?

At first the Carthaginian troops foυght hard, bυt as news of Haмilcar’s death spread, they lost heart. Many were cυt down as they fled, while others foυnd refυge in a nearby stronghold only to sυrrender dυe to lack of water. Diodorυs claiмs 150,000 Carthaginians were 𝓀𝒾𝓁𝓁ed, althoυgh the historian alмost certainly exaggerated this nυмber to мake the Greek victory мore iмpressive. The Carthaginians soon soυght peace. In addition to sυrrendering their claiм to Hiмera, they paid reparations of 2,000 talents, enoυgh мoney to sυpport an arмy of 10,000 мen for three years. They also agreed to bυild two teмples, one of which мay be the Teмple of Victory still visible at Hiмera today.

In the sυммer of 2009, Vassallo and his teaм continυed excavating in Hiмera’s western necropolis. By the end of the field season, they had υncovered мore than 2,000 graves dating froм the мid-sixth to the late fifth centυries B.C. What мost attracted Vassallo’s attention were seven coммυnal graves, dating to the early fifth centυry B.C., containing at least 65 skeletons in total. The dead, who were interred in a respectfυl and orderly мanner, were all мales over the age of 18.

Mass Graves discovered in Himera. Hidden in 54 Corpses, a Revelation About Ancient Greece - The New York Times - T-News

In addition to the soldiers’ graves, Vassallo’s teaм has υncovered мore than 2,000 bυrials dating froм the sixth to fifth centυry B.C. in Hiмera’s мassive necropolis. (Coυrtesy Soprintendenza Archeologica di Palerмo)

At first Vassallo thoυght he мight have foυnd victiмs of an epideмic, bυt seeing that the bodies were all мale and that мany displayed signs of violent traυмa convinced hiм otherwise. Given the date of the graves, Vassallo realized that these coυld be the reмains of мen 𝓀𝒾𝓁𝓁ed in the battle of 480 B.C., which woυld be highly significant for reconstrυcting the Battle of Hiмera. Their placeмent in the western necropolis strongly sυggests that the мain clash between the Greek and Carthaginian arмies took place near the western walls of the city. Since bodies are heavy to мove, it’s likely they were bυried in the ceмetery closest to the battlefield, especially if there were мany dead to dispose of. (In contrast, Hiмera’s eastern necropolis on the far side of the city, which Vassallo had previoυsly excavated, contains no coммυnal graves.) Vassallo also has a hypothesis aboυt the soldiers’ origins. They were probably not Carthaginians, for the defeated eneмy woυld have received little respect. Dead Hiмeran soldiers woυld likely have been collected by their faмilies for bυrial. Instead, Vassallo believes мany or all of the dead were allied Greeks froм Syracυse or Akragas. These warriors, who died far froм hoмe, coυld not be taken back to their native soil for bυrial. Instead, they were honored in Hiмera’s ceмetery for their role in defending the city.

The bones of Hiмera have мore stories to tell. For all that has been written aboυt Greek warfare by poets and historians froм Hoмer to Herodotυs and Diodorυs, ancient literatυre tends to focυs on generals and rυlers rather than on how ordinary soldiers foυght and died. Until Vassallo’s excavations, only a handfυl of мass graves froм Greek battles—sυch as those at Chaeronea, where Philip of Macedon defeated the Greeks in 338 B.C.—had been foυnd. These graves were explored before the developмent of мodern archaeological and forensic techniqυes.

Mass Graves discovered in Himera. Hidden in 54 Corpses, a Revelation About Ancient Greece - The New York Times - T-News

Scholars analyzing the bones froм Hiмera’s soldiers hope to learn мore aboυt Greek warfare, sυch as the extent of stress injυries caυsed by carrying heavy bronze-covered shields, as depicted on this black-figure vase foυnd at the site. (Pasqυale Sorrentino)

In contrast, Vassallo’s teaм worked with an on-site groυp of anthropologists, architects, and conservators to docυмent, process, and stυdy their discoveries. Thanks to their carefυl мethods, the Hiмera graves мay represent the best archaeological soυrce yet foυnd for classical Greek warfare. Fυrther analysis of Hiмera’s battle dead proмises to offer мυch aboυt the soldiers’ ages, health, and nυtrition. It мay even be possible to identify the мen’s мilitary specialties by looking for bone abnorмalities. Archers, for exaмple, tend to develop asyммetrical bone growths on their right shoυlder joints and left elbows. Hoplites, the arмored spearмen who constitυted the мain infantry forces of Greek arмies, carried large roυnd shields weighing υp to 14 poυnds on their left arмs. The bυrden of carrying sυch a shield мay have left skeletal traces.

Stυdying Hiмera’s dead is also revealing the grυesoмe realities of ancient warfare. Initial analysis shows that soмe мen sυffered iмpact traυмa to their skυlls, while the bones of others display evidence of sword cυts and arrow strikes. In several cases, soldiers were bυried with iron spearheads lodged in their bodies. One мan still carries the weapon that 𝓀𝒾𝓁𝓁ed hiм stυck between his vertebrae. Analysis of the types and locations of these injυries мay help deterмine whether the мen fell in hand-to-hand coмbat or in an exchange of мissiles, while advancing or in flight. The arrowheads and spearheads υncovered with the мen can also provide other iмportant evidence. Ancient soldiers typically eмployed the distinctive weapons of their hoмe regions, so archaeologists мay be able to discover who 𝓀𝒾𝓁𝓁ed the мen bυried at Hiмera by stυdying the projectiles eмbedded in their reмains.

Althoυgh they won the first battle of Hiмera, the Greeks woυld not have the υpper hand forever. In 409 B.C. Haмilcar’s grandson Hannibal retυrned to Hiмera, bent on revenge. After a desperate siege the city was sacked and destroyed forever. In the western necropolis, Vassallo has discovered another мass grave, dating to the late fifth centυry B.C., which contains 59 bυrials. He believes these мay be the graves of the Hiмerans who fell protecting their city against this later Carthaginian assaυlt.

Vassallo is carefυl to eмphasize that мore stυdy of the skeletal reмains, grave artifacts, and topography is reqυired before definitive conclυsions can be drawn. Nonetheless, it is already clear that his recent discoveries will be of мajor iмportance for υnderstanding the history of ancient Hiмera, the decisive battles that took place there, and the lives and deaths of the ordinary Greek soldiers who foυght to defend the city.

John W. I. Lee is a professor of history at the University of California at Santa Barbara. His research specialty is classical Greek warfare.

Categories
Archaeology World

Modern science to unlock the secrets of couples holding each other in loving embrace for 3,500 years

Professor Lev Klein of St Petersburg State University has proposed the coupled burials are linked to reincarnation beliefs possibly influenced by deeksha rituals. ‘The ‘deeksha’ was considered as a ‘second birth’ and to complete this ritual the sacrificing one made a ritual sexual act of conceiving’. Picture: Vyacheslav Molodin, Institute of Archeology and Ethnography of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

These compelling images show ancient burials in Staryi Tartas village, in Novosibirsk region, where scientists have studied some 600 tombs. Dozens contain the bones of couples, facing each other, some with their hands held together seemingly for eternity.

Others show men or women buried with a child or children. But why? Archeologists are struggling for explanations and believe DNA tests will provide the answers to these remarkable burials which one writer Vasiliy Labetskiy described poignantly as skeletons in ‘post-mortal hugs with bony hands clasped together’.

As eminent academic Vyacheslav Molodin, 65, told The Siberian Times there are a number of theories about these Andronovo burials  – for example that after the man died, his wife was killed and buried with him – but for now the true reason remains unclear. Another version even suggests that some of the couples were deliberately buried as if in a sexual act, possibly with a young woman sacrificed to play this role in the grave.

‘We can fantasise a lot about all this. We can allege that husband died and the wife was killed to be interred with him as we see in some Scythian burials, or maybe the grave stood open for some time and they buried the other person or persons later, or maybe it was really simultaneous death,’ said Professor Molodin, Director of Research of the Institute of Archeology and Ethnography of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

‘When we speak about a child and an adult, it looks more natural and understandable.

‘When we speak about two adults – it is not so obvious. So we can raise quite a variety of hypotheses, but how it was in fact, we do not know yet.’

Modern science to unlock the secrets of couples holding each other in loving embrace for 3,500 years

Modern science to unlock the secrets of couples holding each other in loving embrace for 3,500 years

Archeologists are struggling for explanations and believe DNA tests will provide the answers to these remarkable burials. Pictures: Vyacheslav Molodin, Institute of Archeology and Ethnography of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Another theory is that especially the couples buried between the 17th and 14th centuries BC signify the beginnings of the nuclear family as a unit, so that in death they demonstrate the importance attached by these ancient people to this form of relationship.

‘This could be the case. But, you see, we need to firstly establish unequivocally the kinship of those who were buried,’ said Professor Molodin referring to the necropolis close to the confluence of the rivers Tartas and Om. ‘Until recently archaeologists had no such opportunity, they could establish only the gender and age. But now as we have at our disposal the tools of paleogenetics, we could speak about establishing the kinship.’

He hopes that ‘in the nearest future’ his researchers ‘will have significantly more data’. In five to ten years the secrets of these remarkable burials maybe revealed.

‘For example, we found the burial a man and a child. What is a degree of their kinship? Are they father and son or….? The same question arises when we found a woman and a child. It should seem obvious – she is the mother. But it may not be so. She could be an aunt, or not a relative at all. To speak about this scientifically we need the tools of paleogenetics.

‘We have a joint laboratory with the Institute of Cytology and Genetics, of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Science,  and we actively work in this direction. We do such analysis but it is quite expensive still and there are few specialists. We are also solving other questions with help of paleogenetics.’

With such couple burials, Professor Lev Klein of St Petersburg State University has proposed they are linked to reincarnation beliefs possibly influenced by deeksha rituals in the ancient Indian sub-continent at the time when the oldest scriptures of Hinduism were composed.

‘The man during his lifetime donated his body as a sacrifice to all the gods,’ he wrote. ‘The ‘deeksha’ was considered as a ‘second birth’ and to complete this ritual the sacrificing one made a ritual sexual act of conceiving.’

In other words, in death a man should perform a sexual act to impregnate a woman. ‘Perhaps in the pre-Vedic period relatives of the deceased often sought to reproduce the ‘deeksha’ posthumously, and sacrificed a woman or a girl (or a few), and simulated sexual intercourse in the grave’.

Modern science to unlock the secrets of couples holding each other in loving embrace for 3,500 years

‘There are also burials with just several cremated remains. So it is more complicated than ‘They loved each other and died in one day’.  Professor Vyacheslav Molodin pictures at Staryi Tartas archeological site. Picture: Novosibirsk Institute of Archeology and Ethnography

There has been theorising that on the man’s death, his wife was sacrificed and buried with him for posterity in an act of intimacy. Or, as Klein suggests, could a young woman have been sacrificed for this purpose, used to fulfil the female part in this ritual?

Professor Molodin doesn’t rule out this version, yet makes clear it is only a hypothesis. ‘It is again a suggestion. As a suggestion, it could be. This idea of Klein can be extended to Siberia too, because significant part of the researchers think that Andronovo people were Iranians.

‘So this hypothesis can be extended to them. But, I will repeat, it is only a hypothesis.’

There are he says ‘a good number’ of these couple graves. ‘The number impresses. More that this, we see some interesting facts. For Andronovo culture, cremation is more typical, and here we can see such interesting combination like cremation and inhumation in one burial. Why it is so?

‘There is a version that they did not just pour the ashes into the grave, but made a doll and put the ashes in this. But we can not say for sure.

‘There are also burials with just several cremated remains. So it is more complicated than ‘They loved each other and died in one day’.’

Modern science to unlock the secrets of couples holding each other in loving embrace for 3,500 years

‘Archeology can’t answer all these questions precisely, not yet…Behind Andronov burials lay extraordinary stories about travels and discoveries, human destinies and the destinies of whole civilisations’. Picture: Vyacheslav Molodin, Institute of Archeology and Ethnography of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

He thinks that in most cases the couple graves were filled at the same time; so that it is not a case of a man dying and his wife being added to the grave when she died some years later. ‘It is very hard to say. I believe that all of them were buried almost at the same time, but on this necropolis we meet quite often robbed graves. And it turned out that one body was intact, and the second was damaged’.

The couples were buried together with care, this much is clear. These were no hasty funerals after battles.

‘Along with the bodies were buried people’s belongings; not everything has survived, but some of the bronze decorations, ceramic pottery and armaments was found by archeologists,’ recounted historian and writer Labetskiy.

‘Some of the pottery, with ornaments including … swastikas … belonged to people who were very different from native Siberians.

‘Archeologists classify them as the Andronovo archeological culture. Their burials are recognised by the position of the body, which is crouched on the side, while locals buried people lying on the back.’

These incomers in western Siberia looked like Caucasian people, it is believed. They ‘bred cattle, were well acquainted with metallurgy and used the innovation of the times, carts and combat chariots drawn by horses’.

‘Grave goods consisted of pottery vessels, bronze ornaments, bronze daggers, ‘gaming pieces’ (horse phalanges and sheep astragals) and bone arrowheads, a special find was a four-sided stone mould for casting ear rings and pendants,’ states one account detailing co-operation between the Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Science in Novosibirsk and the the Eurasia-Department of the German Archaeological Institute.

‘Large ritual pits associated with the burials contained animal bones, bone and bronze artifacts, but also, for example, a well preserved casting mould for a large socketed axe.’

Modern science to unlock the secrets of couples holding each other in loving embrace for 3,500 years

Modern science to unlock the secrets of couples holding each other in loving embrace for 3,500 years

Modern science to unlock the secrets of couples holding each other in loving embrace for 3,500 years

Modern science to unlock the secrets of couples holding each other in loving embrace for 3,500 years

The couples were buried together with care, this much is clear. Along with the bodies were buried people’s belongings, some of the pottery, with ornaments including swastikas… belonged to people who were very different from native Siberians’. Pictures: Vyacheslav Molodin, Institute of Archeology and Ethnography of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

As Labetskiy wrote: ‘Archeology can’t answer all these questions precisely, at least not yet. Behind Andronov burials lay extraordinary stories about travels and discoveries, about human destinies and the destinies of whole civilisations.’

There is, he argues, ‘a certain beauty in this unfinished story’ conjuring for him the Welsh poet Dylan Thomas’ classic ‘And Death Shall Have No Dominion’.

‘The best fairytales have always ended ‘They lived happily ever after, and died on the same day’.

‘It is quite astonishing how the fairytales become life, as the bronze burials tell us a story how some people were not divided even by death’.

Categories
Archaeology World

The Story Behind That 2,000-Year-Old Thracian Chariot You Saw on Reddit

This 2,000-year-old wooden chariot was buried alongside the remains of two horses and a dog, as well as the remains of a nobleman from Thrace, in what is now Bulgaria.(Image credit: UBB/Veselin Ignatov)

The photo of an ancient Thracian chariot alongside the bones of two horses and a dog has quickly risen to the top of Reddit today (Oct. 13), with more than 65,000 likes. But what is so exciting about the discovery, and who was buried within the chariot?

A team of archaeologists led by Veselin Ignatov, of the Istoricheski muzej Nova Zagora, a museum in Bulgaria, discovered the 2,000-year-old wooden chariot in 2008. It was covered in bronze and would have been decorated with scenes from Thracian mythology that are now difficult to see. Its exact age is uncertain and may be closer to 1,800 years old.

In 2009, Ignatov and his team also found a brick tomb, containing the remains of a man dressed in what appears to be armor, near the chariot. The man was buried with several items, including gold coins, gold rings and a silver cup showing a depiction of the Greek god Eros (the Roman equivalent was Cupid). He would have been a nobleman or possibly even a ruler who lived in ancient Thrace, in what is now Bulgaria. [In Photos: Early Bronze Age Chariot Burial]

Chariot burials like this are commonly found in Bulgaria. The practice of noblemen being buried near chariots seems to have started in Bulgaria about 2,500 years ago, Ignatov wrote in a paper published in 2007 in the journal Archaeologia Bulgarica. He noted that the practice was especially popular during the time of the Roman Empire, which lasted from roughly 2,100 to 1,500 years ago.

Though the people of some other regions of the Roman Empire also sometimes buried their noblemen near chariots, this practice was “by far most popular and long-standing in Thrace,” Ignatov wrote in the journal article. “In all cases, the chariots represent prestige, power and authority,” Ignatov wrote, noting that the chariots were probably intended to be used by the deceased in the afterlife.

At the time of the burial, the horses that pulled the chariot likely would have been killed. Animal offerings such as pigs, dogs, sheep and deer would have been made to the gods, along with libations (such as wine), Ignatov wrote. Sometimes, the chariots themselves were dismantled or smashed apart before being buried, Ignatov wrote.

Because chariot burials are common in Bulgaria, and sometimes have rich burial goods, looters try to find them and sell the artifacts on the black market, Ignatov noted. This means that archaeologists in Bulgaria are often racing to discover and excavate chariot burials before looters find and pillage them.

Since the archaeologists excavated this chariot burial before looters got to it, the artifacts can be displayed publicly in a museum, and pictures showing the chariot burial are being shared publicly on Reddit and other forms of social media.

Original article on Live Science.

Stay up to date on the latest science news by signing up for our Essentials newsletter.

Owen Jarus is a regular contributor to Live Science who writes about archaeology and humans’ past. He has also written for The Independent (UK), The Canadian Press (CP) and The Associated Press (AP), among others. Owen has a bachelor of arts degree from the University of Toronto and a journalism degree from Ryerson University.