Categories
Aircraft

Why America Wasted $44 Billion On The B-2 Spirit Stealth Bomber

Northrop Grumman’s B-2 Spirit Stealth Bomber was a costly venture, and one that many felt wasn’t needed after the collapse of the Soviet Union.

The Northrop Grumman B-2 Spirit is one of the most advanced bombers ever created. Known of course as the stealth bomber, the B-2 has provided the backbone of US strategic bombing since the late 1990s. The idea behind the B-2 was to create a military stealth aircraft that could strike deep into the heart of the Soviet Union. However, even before it entered service, the aircraft proved controversial within US Congress. Many felt the B-2 was simply not needed as the Cold War began to wind down.

The cost of the program and its lack of combat service since its introduction is controversial. It means that the program is sometimes seen as a waste of money. As capable as the B-2 Spirit really is, it’s not been able to create the same legacy as its stealth sibling, the F-117 Nighthawk.

The B-2 Spirit Was Designed To Penetrate Deep Into The Soviet Union

The US Air Force needed an aircraft by the mid-1970s that could slip through Soviet territory, nearly undetected. And pretty much immune to an attack by radar guided weapons. Plans for such an aircraft advanced quickly. Lockheed Martin would earn the contract to create the F-117 attack aircraft thanks to its experience with the SR-71 Blackbird. Northrop meanwhile had developed Tacit Blue. This was a demonstration aircraft, and would soon win the contract to produce the B-2. The B-2 project had even more appeal. This following the cancelation of the original B-1 bomber project.

The B-2 was first publicly unveiled in November 1988, but by then there were doubts about the program. It was increasingly clear that the Soviet Union was failing. And it would collapse entirely in 1991. Before the aircraft had even entered service, the sole reason for the B-2s existence was gone. Thus, the initial order for 132 B-2s was dramatically reduced to just 21. As of 2023 20 are in service with one having crashed in 2008. But not only did the dissolution of the Soviet Union hurt the B-2, so did its spiraling costs.

The B-2 Was A Complex And Multi-Billion Dollar Wasted Project

Developing the B-2 Spirit was one of the costliest projects in the United States military history. By 1997, the estimated average cost of one of the 21 B2s was $2.13 billion. With each aircraft costing a staggering $737 million to build. That number rose to $929 million per aircraft after including spare parts, retrofitting and procurement among other things. Once all the development was factored in, the price of the B-2 inflated to that $2.13 billion figure Overall, the B-2 Spirit program cost an eye watering $44 billion, around $71 billion in today’s money. It was easy to see why there were many doubters in congress who thought the B-2 was just a giant waste of money.

The winding down of the Soviet Union simply made things worse. With a stealthy strategic bomber no longer as urgently needed as it had been. The cost of the B-2 to the American taxpayer was hugely controversial. The B-2 was now estimated to cost three times as much annually as the B-1B would when that entered US service. It was also four times more expensive to operate annually than the B-52H. Had the B-2 proven itself in combat however, things might have been different. But the B-2, unlike the F-117, hasn’t had the most interesting of operational careers.

The B-2 Has Only Seen Limited Combat Service

In terms of its stealth capabilities, the B-2 is an exceptional aircraft. It is just as stealthy as the US Air Force had hoped it would be. Which also means less support aircraft are then needed to provide air cover for the bomber. No missiles have ever launched at a B-2 in service, whereas one F-117 was of course shot down in Yugoslavia. Operationally tough, there haven’t been many chances for the B-2 to get locked onto. The B-2 saw limited usage during the 1999 Kosovo War, while it saw service in Afghanistan in 2003 in Operation Enduring Freedom.

Since then the B-2 has seen some service in Libya, and against ISIS in Libya. But for an aircraft that costs around $2 billion each, this isn’t what you might call value for money. It’s not had quite the same career as the B-52.

What Next For The B-2 Spirit Stealth Bomber?

In terms of what the future holds for the B-2, it is now expected to remain in service until 2032. At this point, Northrop Grumman’s new B-21 Raider will replace the bomber. Clearly there is still a need for a stealth bomber within the US Air Force. The B-21 should in theory also replace the B-1B Lancer and potentially the B-52 Stratofortress as well. With it estimated that the cost of one B-21 will be around $700 billion they will certainly be cheaper than the B-2. But the B-2 has at least paved the way more stealth aircraft for the US military in the future.

This model is available in multiple sizes from airmodels.net – CLICK ON THE PHOTO TO GET YOURS.
Categories
Aircraft

X-44 MANTA: Why This F-22 Derivative Never Saw the Light of Day

Here’s What You Need to Know: Like the iconic B-2 stealth bomber, the X-44 design lacked a tail.

The X-44 MANTA, which stands for Multi-Axis No Tail Aircraft, was a futuristic-looking derivative of Lockheed Martin’s iconic F-22 design. According to Air Force Magazine, Lockheed Martin may have designed up to six different airframes similar to the F-22 Raptor that were offered to the Air Force. Though none of them were picked up, this particular design is said to have drawn the interest of NASA as a research platform with which to test controlling tailless designs using thrust vectoring. Meet the X-44 MANTA.

Stealthy by Design

Like the F-22 on which the X-44 was based on, it would have been highly stealthy and may have even been stealthier than its F-22 parent. Renderings of the X-44 concept indicate that it would have carried over the F-22’s air intake inlets that are designed to diffuse enemy radar inside of them rather than reflecting radar outwards.

Like the iconic B-2 stealth bomber, the X-44 design was tailless. Sans tail, these tailless designs are inherently stealthier than other tailed airframes—the X-44 would have had a very low radar signature. Instead of using standard control surfaces to maneuver while in flight, the MANTA maneuvered using thrust vectoring, in which the dual engine’s exhaust nozzles could direct exhaust in various directions.

Though innovative, thrust vectoring designs are nothing new. One successful Russian design in service with the Indian Air Force, a variant of the Sukhoi Su-30, benefits from very high maneuverability thanks to its thrust vectoring engine nozzles.

The modified delta wing design also had a couple of benefits over its predecessor. By design, delta wings have more surface area internally and externally than traditional swept wings and can, therefore, hold more fuel. Using so-called wet wings, also known as integral fuel tanks, a greater volume of fuel could be stored internal in the plane’s wings.

This kind of fuel storage is relatively common and allows for a large amount of fuel to be carried. In addition to higher fuel capacity, the X-44 would have benefited from a more aerodynamic airframe, resulting in lower drag while in flight.

Postscript

The X-44 was one of a number of designs that Lockheed Martin designed and pitched to the U.S. Air Force as a way to augment the branch’s stealthily airframes, though this particular design may be the only one that was tailless. With F-22 production lines long since shuttered, it is unlikely we’ll ever get to see the X-44 MANTA in flight.

Categories
Aircraft

Bad Idea: Why Russia and China are Betting Against the F-35 Stealth Fighter

Who benefits from the United States making a decision to abandon the F-35 program?

Here’s What You Need to Remember: America’s adversaries would like nothing better than for the United States to curtail its buy of the F-35, just like Washington did for the F-22, because there is not an allied or adversary platform in production that can come close to competing with the F-35.

In the last few months, a torrent of scorn has been heaped upon the F-35 stealth fighter jet program, seemingly just in time for the fiscal year 2022 defense budget cycle.

The timing, volume, and the sameness of the talking points from the F-35 jet’s opponents is enough to make you wonder where it’s all coming. Not from F-35 pilots certainly, who overwhelmingly favor the aircraft over their previous jets.

Cui bono is Latin for “who benefits?” And that’s the question we probably should be asking. Who benefits from the United States making a decision to abandon the F-35 program?

Russia and China immediately come to mind. Each in their own way has tried to copy the F-35 but thus far have come up short in manufacturing a comparable plane. They’d love the United States to stop buying the F-35 fighter.

After all would Russia, which has seen fit to meddle with U.S. elections and mount sophisticated disinformation campaigns which undermine confidence in U.S. coronavirus vaccines, and even target U.S. armed forces, pass up an opportunity to sway U.S. public opinion against the F-35 jet? Why wouldn’t they target the world’s most advanced fighter weapons systems to minimize its fielding, while they figure out how to make their own stealth work?

What about China? They also created their own false narratives about the origins of the coronavirus, and western countries responses. They also tried to influence elections in Taiwan. While their J-20 stealth jet fighter looks a lot like the F-35 fighter, beneath the surface, it cannot compare. They’d love to see the U.S. stop buying F-35 jets, which would likely defeat J-20s by the vast margins in combat.

Not that it has to be one of America’s adversaries. Even a rival company could orchestrate a campaign to malign the F-35 jet fighter. But it could never be effective. People would see right through it. Wouldn’t they?

Maybe. Or maybe not. Americans generally trust what they read. A recent survey reveals false headlines fool adults 75 percent of the time.

So just how could the Russians, Chinese, or even a competitor company accomplish such dastardly work?

Proxies perhaps? Sounds like the movie Conspiracy Theory, right? But walk with me down this path for a moment.

You might be surprised to learn there is a thriving Washington, D.C. cottage industry of public relations firms hiring authors with seemingly bonafide credentials to write opinion articles on a variety of topics. They are aided in this effort because many legitimate media outlets don’t disclose the role of a PR firm in placing an Op-Ed. Even the author may not know who is ultimately paying him for his “work.”

Once such an article is written, paid or automated agents of industry or adversarial nations can immediately amplify the story by reposting and retweeting it.

But false narratives need false “facts,” and to support their case, critics of the F-35 have latched onto a few to make their case. Most recently, they have cited the cost and the decision to delay the full-rate production decision as cause to give the F-35 a second look.

So, let’s look at cost. Critics cite the F-35s projected lifetime costs of $1.7 trillion as unaffordable.

No matter who you are, $1.7 trillion is a lot of money. But at what point in the history of fighter aircraft has anyone ever added up all of the costs for development, acquisition, maintenance, fuel and support for the projected lifetime of that weapons system?

You can’t name one because this is a new whim, a tactic if you will, of the sound-bite world.

But for the sake of argument, let’s pick one. Add up the lifetime costs of the F-16 jet fighter from its design in early 1970s through the fielding of all ten variants, its service life extension program, the development and fielding of its new electronically scanned array radar, four different engines, the navigation and multiple targeting pods, maintenance, fuel and support costs for the last forty-six years—and let’s not forget the remaining twenty-six years of its projected life.

Or pick the lifetime costs of the A-10, the AV-8B, or the FA-18A/B/C/D warplanes, their major modifications and service life extension programs—and, because the acquisition of the F-22 stealth fighter jet was curtailed, you have to include at least some portion of the F-15A/B/C/D model fleet. All five weapons systems began development in the late 1960s or 1970s and their support costs will still be racking up years beyond the here and now.

And then remember that the F-35 is going to replace them all.

That’s right—you would have to add up totals for all of them to support a claim that the F-35 is a “rathole” for dollars.

Program critics have recently latched onto the Pentagon’s decision to halt the F-35 full rate production declaration for the foreseeable future.

Not because of the jet’s performance—but because the Joint Simulation Environment isn’t working. That’s right, a simulation is unable to test and validate the performance of a simulated F-35 against simulated threats to prove that it can meet performance expectations in that simulated world.

No other fighter has ever been held back from full-rate production because of a simulation. Not any fourth-generation fighter. Not even America’s other stealth fighter, the F-22 jet.

And yet the maligning efforts of the F-35’s competitors and America’s adversaries alike have taken hold, in spite of the facts.

Pilots who have flown fourth-generation aircraft and are now flying the F-35A jet love it. It costs 30 percent less to acquire than a combat-capable F-15EX jet and the cost per flying hour of those two jets are now a wash. And unlike that dated fighter, the F-35 jet can successfully employ in and around missile systems that will be lethal for aircrews who face them in an F-15EX fighter.

America’s adversaries would like nothing better than for the United States to curtail its buy of the F-35, just like Washington did for the F-22, because there is not an allied or adversary platform in production that can come close to competing with the F-35.

And if policymakers really had doubts about how the F-35 will perform in a simulated high-threat environment, why don’t we just ask the Israelis how it does in a real one?

Categories
Aircraft

5,000 Warplanes Built: Why The ‘Old’ F-4 Phantom II Fighter Is Still Flying High

Taking flight in 1958, the F-4 Phantom was an envelope-pusher, setting 16 different performance records, including for speed and altitude.

Meet the Timeless F-4 Phantom: One of the most adaptable airframes ever used in the U.S. Armed Forces, undoubtedly, was the McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom II.

During a four-decade service run, the U.S. Air Force, U.S. Navy, and U.S. Marine Corps all operated the Phantom – an all-weather, supersonic fighter, bomber, and interceptor.

The Phantom’s adaptability, paired with its commendable, and consistent performance attributed to the fighter earning a ceremonious distinction: the F-4, with 5,195 units built, is the most produced American supersonic military aircraft ever.

Flying Strong and Setting Records

Taking flight in 1958, the Phantom was an envelope-pusher, setting 16 different performance records, including for speed and altitude. The Phantom was well ahead of its time – its speed record remained unbeaten until 1975, when the still-serving F-15 Eagle, with its 50,000 pounds of thrust, set a new mark.

With a top speed of Mach 2.2, the Phantom is quite fast – “Speed is life” was the motto of Phantom pilots – which is remarkable given the Phantom’s brawny dimensions and hulking weight. Measuring 63 feet long, with a max takeoff weight of over 61,000 pounds, one might expect the Phantom to lumber in the air. That is not the case, of course. The Phantom’s two General Electric J79 engines enable 1,400 miles per hour speeds, a service ceiling of 60,000 feet, and a climbing rate of 41,300 feet per minute.

The Phantom was regarded for its acceleration, allowing for smooth engagement and disengagement. However, the Phantom was not particularly maneuverable. Enemy MiGs could typically outturn the F-4, which wasn’t designed for dogfighting and suffered from adverse yaw in tight turns. Instead, the F-4 was intended to fire radar-guided missiles from beyond visual range, not engage in air combat maneuvering, using internal cannons. Actually, the original Phantom variants didn’t even have a cannon, just nine external hardpoints capable of carrying more than nine tons of weaponry. The omission of a cannon was a mistake.

“That was the biggest mistake on the F-4,” John Chesire, who flew 197 combat missions in the F-4 during Vietnam, once said. “Bullets are cheap and tend to go where you aim them. I needed a gun, and I really wished I had one.”

“Everyone in RF-4s wished they had a gun on the aircraft,” Jack Dailey, Director of the National Air and Space Museum, said.

Without guns, special emphasis was placed on the F-4’s heat-seeking and radar-guided missiles, which at the time featured new (unreliable) technology. Often, pilots had to fire multiple missiles at one target. The problem was compounded in Vietnam where rules of engagement required visual identification of the enemy, in effect precluding long-range missile attacks. Regardless, the F-4 is credited with shooting down 107 MiGs in Vietnam.

By the time Saddam Hussein rolled into Kuwait, the F-4 had been in service for three decades. Still, the F-4 proved valuable, operating as “Wild Weasels,” rousting out enemy SAMs. Equipped for a Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses (SEAD) role, the F-4 was vital in protecting coalition aircraft against Saddam’s sophisticated air defense system.

In 1996, the Phantom’s U.S. active-duty service run ended – after nearly fifty years. The jet lives on, however. Greece operates 18 F-4s out of Andravida Air Base. South Korea still has 27 F-4Es. Turkey has 54. And Iran, our former ally, operates 62 F-4s, alongside their still-running F-14 Tomcats.

Categories
Aircraft

Why Russia’s Sukhoi Su-57 Is The World’s Worst Stealth Aircraft

Russia’s Su-57 Felon is a troubled aircraft, and a poor stealth fighter, with an abnormally high radar cross-section and just 10 in active service.

Fifth generation stealth aircraft are appearing in every major military air arm at the moment. Russia is one air arm that has its own, in the form of the Sukhoi Su-57 Felon. The Su-57 first flew in January 2010, but remarkably the aircraft would not enter service until December 2020. A protracted development program meant that the aircraft suffered from various delays and cost overruns. Even now, a very limited number of the Su-57 are actually in Russian Air Force service.

Furthermore, for an aircraft that should have stealth capabilities, the Su-57 falls remarkably short in this area. Aircraft such as the F-22 Raptor and F-35 Lightning II have it beaten in this department. As such, it’s arguable the Su-57 is the world’s worst stealth aircraft currently in service. Here’s why.

The Su-57’s Development Was Full Of Problems

The Su-57 has had one of the most troubled development programs of any modern fighter. What was first dubbed the Tu-50 in its prototype form was initially meant to have three flying prototypes by 2009. However, by 2010, just one had taken flight. The testing program of the ten prototypes build would reveal structural issues within the airframe. This necessitated a total redesign from the sixth prototype onwards. This to resolve the fatigue life problems befalling the earlier aircraft. These issues meant the initial order of 70 aircraft would become hard for Sukhoi to meet.

Western sanctions of Russia’s annexation of Crimea in 2014 saw the first order cut down to 52 aircraft. Although that number has since risen back to 76 after further investment. Two Saturn AL-41F1 afterburning turbofans are in the Su-57, which does give it an impressive top speed of Mach 2 or 1,327 mph. So there is no denying that the Su-57 is a fast and punchy aircraft, one that also has shown great agility at airshows. However, thanks to its long and troubled development, the amount of Su-57s in active service barely crosses into double digits even in 2023.

Only A Small Number Are In Service In 2023

According to sources such as United Aircraft Corporation, just 10 Su-57s are in service as of December 2022. The Su-57 has seen some use in the current conflict in Ukraine. However, it’s been strictly limited to use within Russian airspace. Russia would not want to risk any of its Su-57s getting shot down, nor risk the technology it possesses becoming common knowledge among the West. Regarding when an operational regiment of Su-57s is actually expected, this is unlikely to happen until 2025. Showing how delayed the project has become.

It is unlikely that the Su-57 will have any major impact on the outcome of the war in Ukraine. Even with 10 in service, it is unlikely all of them are in operation right now. It’s also highly unlikely that Russia will risk using the aircraft beyond their current long-range roles. This thanks to this small service number. The Su-57 then is at the moment one of the most ineffective aircraft in Russian military service. And outnumbered by practically everything else the Air Force is using.

The Su-57 Has A Poor Radar Cross-Section

The idea of a stealth aircraft is to have as low a radar cross-section as possible. The lower the cross-section, the harder it is for the aircraft to get picked up on radar. However, if various reports are to believed then the Su-57 has quite a poor radar cross-section. It is also estimated it has a cross-section between 0.1 and one square meters, considered broadly to be around 0.5. That is on a par with non-stealth fourth-generation aircraft such as the F/A-18 Super Hornet. Compare this to the cross-section of the F-35 which is between 0.0015 and 0.005 square meters. The Raptor is even better at between 0.0001 to 0.0005 square meters.

While this is a bit of a problem for the Su-57, the aircraft does fall within the parameters for a stealth aircraft. And it is still much less detectable than other military aircraft such as the F-16 Fighting Falcon and F-15 Eagle. It’s just in comparison to its main rivals, it has a poor cross-section.

The Su-57 Is A Troubled Stealth Aircraft

So it is fair to say that the Su-57 is quite the troubled aircraft. It has not had the easiest development, and is still suffering from that to this day. So few are in service right now, and Russia is unable to use them effectively. It’s unlikely they will provide any meaningful service to Russia for some time. Currently, it is unclear if the full order of 76 will actually enter service.

Categories
Aircraft

The World War II F4U Corsair Was The Allies’ Best Weapon In The Pacific

In the European Theater of World War II, the P-51 Mustang was the top aircraft when it came to shooting down or otherwise nullifying Axis airpower. In the Pacific, planes like the P-38 Lightning scored major hits against the Imperial Japanese, including killing Imperial Japanese Navy Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto. But the real king of the skies over the Pacific Ocean was the Vought F4U Corsair.

It was a veritable hotrod of a fighter plane, and with a top speed of 446 miles per hour, it was briefly the fastest plane in the U.S. arsenal. it was powered by a 45.9-liter 18-cylinder radial Pratt and Whitney R-2800 “Double Wasp” engine that churned out an astonishing 2,000 hp. For comparison, the 27-litre V12 “Merlin” engine used by the famed Mustang was rated at 1,490 hp. The Corsair engine’s distinctive howl gave earned it the nickname of “the Whistling Death.” Its cockpit was pushed pack to accommodate its huge engine. But the most distinctive feature of the Corsair was its pair of folding gull-wings that allowed it to be more compact on the deck of an aircraft carrier.

The P-38 Lightning gets the credit for the most air-to-air kills in the Pacific Theater, primarily because it was in combat longer than the Corsair. Right after it showed up on the scene in 1943, the Corsair proved to be incredible at air-to-air combat against the quickly dwindling power of the Japanese Empire.

The bane of Imperial Japanese fighters


The folding design of the Corsair lent itself to carrier-based operations by the Navy, but that was only a small part of the its story. Problems with the airframe when it was first introduced delayed its Naval ship debut until 1944. It was used to great effect as a land-based fighter by the U.S. Marines during the Allied Force’s island-hopping campaign. The primary air-to-air armament of the Corsair were six .50 caliber machine guns. But it was also capable of carrying bombs, rockets, and whatever else the Marine Corps needed to make life difficult for the Imperial Navy and Army. The Corsair’s versatility and carrier-centric design made the plane infinitely valuable when taking off and attacking from short hastily prepared runways on Pacific Islands.

As the war came to a close, desperate Japanese forces deployed Kamikaze pilots who would intentionally ram their aircraft into Allied targets. When the Corsair saw combat from the deck of an aircraft carrier, it excelled at repelling these attacks and other last ditch efforts by the Imperial Navy.

Into Korea and beyond


The numbers illustrate the Corsair’s story of dominance over the Imperial Japanese Navy’s aircraft. Over the course of the war, the Corsair down a total of 2,140 aircraft for an absolutely mind-boggling 11-to-1 kill ratio. Specifically, the “Jolly Rogers” of Fighter Squadron 17 were responsible for downing 152 planes. The Corsair was also exported to use by British Royal Navy. Flying for the U.S. military, the Corsair stayed in service until after the Korean War. During that conflict, a Corsair flown by Marine Captain Jesse Folmar managed to down a Soviet MiG-15 fighter plane.

Export versions of the plane remained flying until the 1970s, proving the Corsair’s fighting mettle. Much like the P-38 Lightning, the Corsair likely wasn’t going to win any contests in the looks department, but few other aircraft that have ever flown can measure up to the Corsair in terms of sheer combat effectiveness when it was needed most.

Categories
Aircraft

The Saab 37 Viggen Fighter – A Plane With a Reverse Gear

Of all the planes produced during the Cold War, one of the most interesting to look at remains the Swedish Air Force’s Saab 37 Viggen (“Bolt”). The plane is easily recognizable for its enormous canards and its delta wing configuration; although both innovations preceded it and were used later on other jets, notably China’s Chengdu J-20 “Mighty Dragon”, it was one of the first modern fighter jets to use either.

Of all the planes produced during the Cold War, one of the most interesting to look at remains the Swedish Air Force’s Saab 37 Viggen (“Bolt”). The plane is easily recognizable for its enormous canards and its delta wing configuration; although both innovations preceded it and were used later on other jets, notably China’s Chengdu J-20 “Mighty Dragon”, it was one of the first modern fighter jets to use either.

The Saab 37 could fly at speeds of above Mach 2 at high altitudes; unusually, it could also operate from runways of 500 meters. By comparison, the Grumman F-14 Tomcat, an American jet from the same period, required more than 750 meters to land.

The Saab 37’s efficiency in this regard is a function of its unusual engine design. To keep its landing distance minimal, Saab integrated a thrust-reverser into the Volvo engine, making the Saab the first and only single-engine fighter jet with such a measure included. Flight instructor Thomas Kolb explains the engine on Quora:

“With the Viggen, three triangular metal “petals” in the engine exhaust could be folded down by the pilot pulling out a T-shaped lever on the left side of the dashboard in the cockpit. This would then direct the entire air stream from the engine forward through slits around the back of the fuselage.”

A jet is normally powered by the propulsion of air backward, pushing the plane forward. By covering the exhaust and redirecting the air pressure through forward-facing slits, the plane would be pushed backward, slowing it down on a runway.

Kolb continues: “If the reversor was activated in flight, the system would become armed so that the reversor plates would automatically close as soon as the main and the nose undercarriages became compressed when touching the ground. By pushing the throttle forward and adding power, the pilot could then get the aircraft to a surprisingly short stop.” According to Kolb, this innovation came about because of Swedish defense policy, which dictated that the jets should be able to land within short stretches of flat space, such as on sections of road, in the case of emergencies.

Fortunately, this innovation was never necessary in a time of war. A positive side effect, noted Kolb, was that the planes were able to perform a creative stunt at air shows: land on a short runway, use the engine in alternating directions to turn the plane fully around with a Y-turn, and take off again in the opposite direction. One wonders if parallel parking will be next.

Categories
Aircraft

‘Hitler’s Stealth Fighter’ Wasn’t Exactly Stealthy

Here’s What You Need to Remember: The Ho 229 might have been a formidable adversary over the skies of World War II, but in truth the plane was far from ready for mass production by the war’s end. While it seems a stretch to claim that the Ho 229 was intended to be a stealth aircraft, there’s little doubt that it pioneered design features that continue to see use in low-observable aircraft today.

Northrop Grumman revealed this year it is developing a second flying wing stealth bomber, the B-21 Raider, to succeed its B-2 Spirit. However, it was a pair of German brothers in the service of Nazi Germany that developed the first jet-powered flying wing—which has been dubbed, debatably, “Hitler’s stealth fighter.”

But maximizing speed and range, not stealth, was the primary motivation behind the bat-shaped jet plane.

Walter Horten was an ace fighter pilot in the German Luftwaffe, having scored seven kills flying as wingman of the legendary Adolf Galland during the Battle of Britain. His brother Reimar was an airplane designer lacking a formal aeronautical education. In their youth, the pair had designed a series of innovative tail-less manned gliders.

In 1943, Luftwaffe chief Herman Goering laid out the so-called 3×1000 specification for a plane that could fly one thousand kilometers an hour carrying one thousand kilograms of bombs with fuel enough to travel one thousand kilometers and back—while still retaining a third of the fuel supply for use in combat. Such an airplane could strike targets in Britain while outrunning any fighters sent to intercept it.

Clearly, the new turbojet engines Germany had developed would be required for an airplane to attain such high speeds. But jet engines burned through their fuel very quickly, making raids on more distant targets impossible. The Horten brothers’ idea was to use a flying wing design—a tail-less plane so aerodynamically clean it generated almost no drag at all. Such an airframe would require less engine power to attain higher speeds, and therefore consume less fuel.

Flying wing designs were not an entirely new idea and had been used before in both gliders and powered aircraft. During World War II, Northrop developed its own high-performing XB-35 flying wing bomber for the U.S. military, though it failed to enter mass production. Despite the aerodynamic advantages, the lack of a tail tended to make fly wing aircraft prone to uncontrolled yaws and stalls.

The Horten brothers were given the go-ahead to pursue the concept in August 1943. They first built an unpowered glider known as the H.IX V1. The V1 had long, thin swept wings made of plywood in order to save weight. These “bell-shaped” wings compensated for yawing problem. Lacking a rudder or ailerons, the H.IX relied upon “elevons” (combinations of ailerons and elevators) and two sets of spoilers for control. The elevons could be moved differentially to induce roll, or together in the same direction to change pitch, while the spoilers were used to induce yaw.

Following successful tests of the V1 glider at Oranienberg on March 1944, the subsequent V2 prototype was mounted with two Jumo 004B turbojet engines nestled to either side of a cockpit pod made of welded steel tubing. It also featured a primitive ejection seat and a drogue chute deployed while landing, while redesigned tricycle landing gear was installed to enable the plane to carry heavier loads.

The first test flight occurred on February 2, 1945. The manta-shaped jet exhibited smooth handling and good stall resistance. The prototype even reportedly beat an Me 262 jet fighter, equipped with the same Jumo 004 engines, in a mock dogfight.

But the testing process was cut short on February 18 when one of the V2’s jet engines caught fire and stopped mid-flight. Test pilot Erwin Ziller performed a number of turns and dives in an effort to restart the engine, before apparently passing out from the fumes and spiraling his plane into the ground, mortally wounding him.

Regardless, Goering had already approved the production of forty flying wings, to be undertaken by the Gotha company, which mostly produced trainers and military gliders during World War II. The production planes were designated Ho 229s or Go 229s.

Because of the Ho 229’s great speed—it was believed the production version would be able to attain 975 kilometer per hours—it was repurposed to serve as a fighter with a planned armament of two heavy Mark 103 thirty-millimeter cannons. Construction of four new prototypes—numbered V3 throuh V6— was initiated, two of which would have been two-seat night fighters.

However, the Ho 229 never made it off the ground. When American troops of VIII Corps rolled into the factory at Friedrichroda, Germany in April 1945, they found just the cockpit sections of the prototypes in various stages of development. A single pair of corresponding wings was found 75 miles away. The most complete of the four, the V3 prototype, was shipped back to the United States for study along with the wings, and can today be seen under restoration at the Udvar-Hazy Center of the United States Air and Space Museum in Chantilly, Virginia.

The Hortens were reassigned to draft specifications for a flying wing jet bomber with range enough to deliver an atom bomb to the east coast of the United States. Their resulting schematics for the Horten H.XVIII “Amerika Bomber” flying wing were never realized, except arguably in the film Captain America.

Was the Ho 229 a stealth fighter?

One word you haven’t seen in this history so far is “stealth”—and that’s because there isn’t any documentation from the 1940s supporting the notion that the flying wing was intended to be a stealth aircraft. And yet, the Hortens had stumbled upon the fact that a flying wing design lends itself to the sort of reduced radar cross-section ideal for a stealth plane.

Reimer Horten moved to Argentina after the war, and in 1950 wrote an article for the Revista Nacional de Aeronautica arguing that wooden aircraft would absorb radar waves. Thirty years later, as the theory behind stealth aircraft became more widely known, Reimer wrote that he had intentionally sought to make the Horten flying wing into a stealth plane, claiming that he had even constructed the airframe using a special radar absorbent mixture of carbon, sawdust and wood glue without notifying his superiors. Two tests were undertaken to determine the presence of the carbon dust, one of which supported his claim and the other that didn’t. In general, historians are skeptical that stealth was a design goal from the outset.

In 2008, Northrop Grumman teamed up with the National Geographic channel to reconstruct a mockup of the Ho 229, which they tested for radar reflection, and then pitted against a simulation of the British Chain Home radar network. Their findings were less than overwhelming—the flying wings would have been detected at a distance 80 percent that of a standard German Bf. 109 fighter.

The Northrop testers stressed that combined with the Ho 229’s much greater speed, this modest improvement would have given defending fighters too little time to react effectively.

But of course, the flying wing’s main feature was always supposed to be its speed, which could have exceeded the maximum speed of the best Allied fighters of the time by as much as 33 percent. Detection time would not have mattered greatly if it could outrun everything sent to intercept it. Furthermore, stealth would have had little usefulness in the fighter role the Ho 229 would actually have assumed, as the Allied daylight fighters ranging over Germany did not benefit from radars of their own.

The Ho 229 might have been a formidable adversary over the skies of World War II, but in truth the plane was far from ready for mass production by the war’s end. While it seems a stretch to claim that the Ho 229 was intended to be a stealth aircraft, there’s little doubt that it pioneered design features that continue to see use in low-observable aircraft today.

Categories
Aircraft

This Is Why The A-10 Warthog Is One Of The Scariest Military Planes

The A-10 Thunderbolt II, or Warthog, is one of the most iconic American military planes ever made!

The A-10 Thunderbolt II, affectionately referred to as the “Warthog” or simply “Hog,” was built by the Fairchild Republic and has been adopted and deployed in battle with devastating outcomes exclusively by the United States Air Force since 1976. The aircraft had its first flight in 1972 and remained in production until 1984. Overall, more than 700 units of the A-10 were built with just 390 units of those still active.

Following in the footsteps of its predecessor, the P-47 Thunderbolt, the A-10, which was created in the middle of the Cold War, also wreaked havoc on enemy tanks, armored vehicles, as well as aircraft, becoming a vital component of the AirLand Battle strategy developed by the US. The A-10 is still in active service, and it’s also among the most revered military planes for the reasons we’ve listed here.

10. Purposefully Designed

The threat posed by the Soviet Union’s large numbers of tanks led the US Air Force to request an aircraft specifically designed to carry out CAS missions and make enemy armor useless. The requirements for the design entailed a low-cost aerial unit capable of attacking enemy troops at low altitudes with high-speed weaponry and survivability.

These requirements later expanded to include a maximum speed of 450 MPH and an operating speed of 300 MPH. Six proposals were submitted and the Fairchild Republic was awarded the contract to make prototypes, hence the birth of the A-10 Warthog.

9. Specifications

The A-10 Thunderbolt II is powered by two identical General Electric TF34-GE-100 turbofans. Each engine generates a thrust of 9,065 pounds, making the plane powerful enough for take-off at short distances. It has a length of 16.16 meters and a wingspan of 17.42 meters.

Furthermore, a striking feature of the A-10 is the unconventional placement of its engine and tail. It was designed that way to thwart enemies with heat-seeking missiles.

8. Precision Engagement Upgrade

The A-10 precision engagement upgrade program aimed at enhancing the precision of the Hog’s targeting capabilities. This allowed the A-10 to deploy precision weapons like the Wind Corrected Munitions Dispenser and Joint Direct Attack Munition.

Other improvements to the Aircraft include situational awareness datalinks, new 5-inch-by-5-inch Raytheon Technical multifunction cockpit displays, digital stores management system, and an integrated flight and fire control computer to assist pilots in the continuous weapon delivery and target pods for precision-guided weapons.

7. Survivability

The A-10 is very tough. It was built to take a beating while firing at enemy troops with low-altitude armor-piercing ammunition. The A-10 sports a honeycomb panel design that makes up a large portion of the wing and tail, making it more resistant to damage.

The cockpit is also encased in titanium armor capable of absorbing direct hits from armor-piercing rounds and a ballistic glass canopy capable of protecting the pilots and vital components from small arms. Just seven A-10s have ever been shot down or crashed in combat.

6. Weapons

Due to its amazing lethal firepower, the Warthog can be described as an airplane mounted on a gun. Its major weapon is a 30 millimeter GAU-8/A Avenger Gatling gun designed to spray high explosive incendiary ammo and armor-piercing depleted uranium rounds – the size of beer bottles – on enemy tanks and troops in short bursts.

The gun is not just powerful, but also precise. The A-10 can strike within 40 feet of its target obliterating everything within its scope.

5. Made For Close Combat

The A-10 Warthog is the golden standard for close combat aircraft, due to its ability to maneuver at low altitudes and still dish out lethal blows to enemy troops. This relentless and tough ground attack plane will destroy the enemy’s armor and artillery and not even a bad weather condition will dampen the Hog’s wrath.

The aircraft is capable of loitering around the battlefield and even operates in low visibility conditions, while night vision goggles also aid the pilots during operations carried out in the dark.

4. Low Production Costs

The A-10 was designed to be cheap to produce with the US prioritizing cost over performance. The aircraft was designed to take a lot of damage, hence, it was built with simple and cheap materials for easy replacement of the damaged parts. In case of an all-out war with the Soviets, the easily produced and large quantity of replacement parts were huge factors.

The A-10’s low production cost is also one of the factors that have kept the aircraft in service to date with each unit costing about $13 million in 1994 dollars.

3. Gulf War Heroics

The air superiority of the A-10 allowed for its use in different roles during the Gulf War. Its primary role was to destroy enemy tanks while other roles played by the aircraft in the war include suppressing the enemy air defenses and attacking Iraqi early warning radars.

In one of its most incredible feats during the war, several A-10s destroyed more than 900 Iraqi tanks, 1,200 artillery pieces, and 2,000 other military vehicles. According to a captured Iraqi captain, the A-10 Warthog was the most recognizable and feared aircraft in the Gulf War.

2. Adored By Ground Soldiers

When the army and marine troops find themselves in bad situations, only one aircraft is needed to level the playing field – the A-10. The Warthog is highly revered by U.S. ground troops. Its accurate weapons delivery is more than well developed to support the ground soldiers.

There is the smell of victory and freedom in the air whenever soldiers hear the familiar gun sounds of the Warthog, with Major Paul Doran commenting that the survival of the ground soldiers often depends on the effectiveness of the aircraft.

1. Ageless

The power of the A-10 cannot be over-emphasized. Its ability to deliver precise devastating strikes is a real game changer. However, despite its power, the A-10 has been under constant threat of retirement. First, the F-16 was created to take over its job and then followed by the F-35.

Though these two planes carry the same weight as the A-10 to battle, they were built for different combat styles. The A-10 persists today because it excels in its role as a powerful air support vehicle, earning it a spot in the vanguard of current military operations regardless of its age.

Categories
Aircraft

Republic P-47 Thunderbolt: The Most Produced American Fighter of World War II

The “Juggernaut,” the “Jug” – whatever you want to call it, the Republic P-47 Thunderbolt was an absolute beast in the skies over Europe and the Pacific during the Second World War. The American fighter, capable of effectively attacking targets in the air and on the ground, was incredibly popular among Allied pilots, and it gave the Axis powers a run for their money.

The following are 16 facts about the storied fighter.

Proving impressive, even in the prototype phase

XP-47 on a stand in a wind tunnel
XP-47 during wind tunnel tests. (Photo Credit: National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics / Airscape Magazine / Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain)

The P-47 Thunderbolt was an impressive aircraft, not only in its final form, but also in the prototype phase. Known as the XP-47B during this period, it took its first flight on May 6, 1941. Despite some issues (an oil drip that filled the cockpit with smoke), it was deemed a successful test.

Heaviest single-seat piston fighter in the world

Republic P-47N Thunderbolt in flight
Republic P-47N Thunderbolt, 1940s. (Photo Credit: U.S. Air Force / Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain)

While we often think of fighter aircraft as on the lighter side, as they need to be able to easily maneuver through the air during an engagement with the enemy, the P-47 Thunderbolt was anything but light. The aircraft weighed 10,000 pounds when empty, and when loaded with fuel, ammunition and, of course, the pilot, it wound up heavier than some Luftwaffe bombers, at eight tons.

The Republic P-47 Thunderbolt had a massive propeller

Four Republic P-47 Thunderbolts in flight
Republic P-47 Thunderbolt, 1944. (Photo Credit: Bettmann / Getty Images)

The P-47 Thunderbolt had an unusually large propeller that measured just over 13 feet in diameter. The component, powered by a Pratt & Whitney R-2800-59 engine, meant engineers were forced to adapt other parts of the design. This included a longer-than-normal retractable landing gear, as this was the only way the propeller would clear the ground.

Heavy firepower

Republic P-47 Thunderbolt firing its M2 Browning machine guns in flight
Republic P-47 Thunderbolt firing its M2 Browning machine guns. (Photo Credit: U.S. Air Force / Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain)

Given its role as a fighter aircraft, it’s only natural that the P-47 Thunderbolt was armed to the brim with firepower. The D-40 variant was equipped with eight M2 Brownings capable of firing 425 each and 10 High Velocity Aircraft Rockets (HVARs). It could also carry up to 2,500 pounds of bombs.

The Republic P-47 Thunderbolt featured an innovative cockpit

Republic P-47 Thunderbolt in flight
Republic P-47 Thunderbolt, 1943. (Photo Credit: CORBIS / Getty Images)

To ensure pilots weren’t uncomfortable in the heat of battle, the P-47 Thunderbolt was equipped with an innovative cockpit. Not only was it rather roomy, but it also featured electric fuel indicators, adequate ventilation, air-conditioning and variable heating for the gun bay. On top of this, the seat was incredibly comfortable, with some pilots comparing it to a lounge chair.

The D variant of the aircraft introduced the bubble canopy, which increased visibility.

Ideal for escort roles

Crewman loading a bomb beneath the wing of a Republic P-47 Thunderbolt
Republic P-47 Thunderbolt equipped with a bomb, 1944. (Photo Credit: Mondadori / Getty Images)

Given its agility and fuel capacity, the P-47 Thunderbolt was perfect for escorting bombers. While on strategic bombing missions, it played a dual fighter-bomber role, shooting ground targets and using belly shackles to carry and drop bombs.

With continued success in the skies, the US Army Air Forces wound up making the P-47 its primary fighter-bomber.

Adding an auxiliary fuel tank

Republic P-47C Thunderbolt parked on the tarmac
Republic P-47C Thunderbolt. (Photo Credit: San Diego Air & Space Museum / Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain)

Range is incredibly important during bombing runs, which involve flying for hundreds of miles before encountering the planned target. With the P-74C Thunderbolt, an auxiliary fuel tank was added, which could be dropped once it was empty, lightening the aircraft’s load.

These auxiliary tanks were carried on combat raids, beginning in March 1944, letting the P-47C escort bombers all the way to the German capital of Berlin. By the time the P-47D was introduced, the fighter could carry up to three drop tanks, providing it with an impressive range.

Speaking of the ‘D’ variant…

Republic P-47D Thunderbolt in flight
Republic P-47D Thunderbolt, 1945. (Photo Credit: PhotoQuest / Getty Images)

The classic version of the P-47 Thunderbolt was the D variant, which was introduced in the middle of the Second World War. The conflict had meant the US Army Air Forces needed to accelerate improvements to its fighters, and this new variant benefited from this work.

The P-47D featured a better turbocharger, a more powerful engine, an emergency booster function, tires that could withstand the roughest of airstrips and improved armor. It also saw the addition of the aforementioned bubble canopy, as well as the drop tanks and the ability to carry bombs.

Most produced American fighter aircraft of World War II

Republic P-47 Thunderbolt in flight
Republic P-47 Thunderbolt, 2014. (Photo Credit: Tim Felce / Wikimedia Commons CC BY-SA 2.0)

The American public dedicated themselves to manufacturing aircraft for those fighting in Europe and the Pacific, and the fighter that saw the most units leave the production line was the P-47 Thunderbolt. A total of 15,683 were produced, which comes as no surprise, given how successful it was in the skies over enemy territory.

The Republic P-47 Republic participated in over 700,000 sorties

Four Republic P-47 Thunderbolts in flight
Republic P-47 Thunderbolt, 1945. (Photo Credit: United States Army Air Forces / Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain)

Despite the impression created by its size and weight, the P-47 Thunderbolt was an agile aircraft that became incredibly popular among pilots. While it was ultimately replaced in its long-range escort role in Europe by the North American P-51 Mustang, the fighter flew in over 746,000 sorties, with an aerial kill ratio of 4.6:1.

Flown by Gabby Gabreski

Portrait of Gabby Gabreski
Gabby Gabreski. (Photo Credit: U.S. Air Force / Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain)

Among the pilots to fly the P-47 Thunderbolt was American air ace Gabby Gabreski, who earned the title in the Second World War and in Korea. Gabreski flew the fighter while assigned to the 56th Fighter Group, and by the end of World War II had 28 confirmed kills, with three additional aircraft destroyed on the ground.

Capable of surviving substantial damage

Three Republic P-47 Thunderbolts in flight
Republic P-47 Thunderbolt, 1942. (Photo Credit: Hulton Archive / Getty Images)

Both the P-47 Thunderbolt’s large body and its radial engine were able to survive substantial damage, making it incredibly safe to fly in combat. This meant that pilots knew that when they entered the cockpit they’d return to base.

Republic P-47M Thunderbolt

Republic P-47M Thunderbolt parked on the tarmac
Republic P-47M Thunderbolt. (Photo Credit: San Diego Air & Space Museum Archives / Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain)

Built for speed following the advent of the V-1 flying bomb and jet technology, the Republic P-47M was capable of hitting a top speed of 473 MPH. However, the addition of a new engine, supercharger and brakes only resulted in new issues, which delayed the aircraft’s debut to just a few weeks before the war in Europe ended in May 1945.

The first issue, a cracked ignition harness, was found after one of the P-47Ms crashed. This was followed by the discovery of a problem with the fuel carburetor diaphragm and rust in the pistons.

What about the ‘N’ variant?

Republic P-47N-25-RE Thunderbolt parked outside of an airport hangar
Republic P-47N-25-RE Thunderbolt, 1946. (Photo Credit: United States Air Force / Air Classics Magazine / Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain)

With the war in the Pacific raging on, the P-47M Thunderbolt was updated to include a longer-span wet-wing with squared-off wingtips. This upgrade not only gave pilots more control when it came to turning, but also afforded an increased fuel capacity, with the N variant capable of flying 2,350 miles.

The Republic P-47 Thunderbolt saw active service with the Allies

Royal Air Force (RAF) airmen standing around the cockpit of a Republic P-47D-25 "Thunderbolt Mark II"
Royal Air Force (RAF) Republic P-47D-25 “Thunderbolt Mark II,” 1945. (Photo Credit: Royal Air Force Official Photographer / Imperial War Museums / Getty Images)

Several Allied countries outside of the United States flew the P-47 Thunderbolt. The Royal Air Force (RAF) received 250 units of the D variant, designated the “Thunderbolt Mark I,” and 590 P-47D-25s, dubbed the “Thunderbolt Mark II.” As well, the Free French Air Forces (FAFL) received 446 P-47Ds, which aided in their efforts in both France and Germany.

On top of this, the Brazilian Air Force’s 1st Fighter Squadron flew 48 P-47Ds during the Italian Campaign, with a section of the Mexican Air Force, under the purview of the US Army Air Forces, operating the fighters in the Philippines.

The Soviets weren’t all that impressed…

Ilyushin Il-2 in flight
Ilyushin Il-2. (Photo Credit: No Info / Wikimedia Commons / Public Domain)
While the Soviet Union received the P-47 Thunderbolt, the Red Army wasn’t all that impressed with the aircraft. Instead, it was decided the Ilyushin Il-2 would be the Russians’ primary fighter, with over 38,000 being built over the course of WWII.